
Land, namely the Earth, is the basis for all human life.

A [[Culture]] is the relationship between people and land. 

However, is it the relationship between the land and its people, or the people and their land?
This question is at the heart of the Globalist - Tribalist divide.

The question, when posed this way, is a question of whether we are reliant on greater forces or whether we are gods who will shape the universe.



[[Invention]] is the greatest shaper of the universe - whether the invention of life itself, or one of life's inventions - such as the printing press.

This question can be phrased another way - which is the primary mechanism of invention?
Sexual, or mental?

Mental invention, such as of writing or the steam engine, has been one of the primary drivers of human life.
However, sexual invention has birthed humans themselves.



*The Thesis of the Globalist Religion*:
We have created humans with the capability to produce paradise and eternal life. Therefore, the project of sexual invention is over. Now, we can use brain invention to supplant sexual invention, and this will enshrine us as gods. 

A mind-based, Globalist perspective seeks to replace the invention mechanism of DNA with inventions of the human brain. Essentially, they believe future life will come from the human brain instead of from sex.

This is an interesting assertion, because it essentially argues that the brain is a better information storage and retrieval device than DNA. DNA stores, so far, the greatest information we could think of - the information of Life. The brain stores the Globalist's preferred medium of information, human symbols.



A lot of this philosophy comes form too much comfort. Overthinking and comfort lead to a preponderance of theory and wishing without actual substance.



Now, one could argue that the DNA is obviously better for this than the brain - after all, DNA stores information for the brain itself. But now, we have the computer - so the question then becomes, can the brain create a storage device which is better than DNA?

The one advantage of the brain in this argument is that, though it stores less information than DNA, it has more ability for interconnection. Or does it?

Certainly, we can communicate thoughts through the computer, but we can also communicate emotions, which can be thought of as a more DNA-based communication mechanism.

  

Because they believe this, they believe distinctions based on sex and DNA are outdated. They believe that the idea of an ethnic nation is outdated. They try and minimize differences between the nations - and between people.



The greatest mechanism for invention is sex and DNA.

The idea of one nation ruling the others is the idea of one set or type of DNA ruling others. Building a nation used to be the project of building DNA.

The project of the church is sexual invention of people who are like Christ.