
This man’s testimony is absolutely fascinating. It really challenged me to consider how vast the mercy of Jesus really is. He was literally experiencing hell, and Jesus rescued him. Listen to the way he describes both hell and heaven. He certainly has some things to say about race and racism also. Clearly, a man who has been changed by the power of Jesus’s love.

While I understand and agree with some of your points that it’s beneficial to focus on traditional Christian values and supporting each other in maintaining what is good in our cultural heritage. My real goal is about the kingdom of heaven, not any kingdom of man on earth. And the currency of heaven is love. It is Jesus who unites us. And the enemy who divides us.

Also, I love your house. It was fun to see you yesterday.
	
	I’ll give it a watch.
	And thanks, it was fun.
	Why do you think they put religion in the Civil Rights Act, along with race?

Hmmm… my guess is as a majority “Christian” nation perhaps some people were discriminating against Jews and or Muslims, etc., when they were applying for housing or jobs.
There is a difference between immutable differences among us like race and sex versus things we can choose like political values or maybe even religion. But it would seem the civil rights act was an attempt to make things more fair for everyone because some with leverage or power were not judging people on the content of their character. 
I think the civil right a Against hard and biased hearts. Unfortunately, the pendulum has swung too far now. And we are once again back to judging people, according to externals and not the content of their character.
Civil Rights act was an attempt to correct hard and biased hearts

	Interesting, biased how?

Not allowing someone to buy a house in a certain neighborhood because of the color of their skin. Or not renting an apartment because the renter was a woman and not a man. Or not hiring or paying equal pay for equal work because someone was black or female, etc..

	Where do you think that bias came from?
	And do you think it’s wrong for Christians to be biased towards other Christians? 

Probably cultural traditions and stereotypes, and maybe lack of exposure to people who were different from them in order to know them as human beings and see what was good inside of them.

I think there Call themselves Christians who have a form of religion, but do not really know Jesus or his ways and are not truly led by the Holy Spirit. I think if someone is a true follower of Jesus, their goal should be helping others to know an experience Jesus. So being biased against other Christians is not in keeping with the ways of Jesus. Again, we always want to focus on what separates us not what unites us. And that is how the enemy works. 

	Don’t you think that the more homogenous a community, the less people will think about race? 
	I.e. if a man of one race only knows others of his race, how often will he be thinking about other races he has never even met? 

Sam, I don’t even have a homogenous family. I have a daughter of another race. And yet I never look at her and see her as culturally Chinese. She is an Erikson 100%. A funny thing, when she was in about second grade 2 separate friends told me stories of how their daughters of approximately the same age or totally shocked to learn that Susie was adopted. Because when they looked at her, they just saw her as part of our family and they didn’t recognize that her Asian features indicated she was from a different race. I think people have to be taught to focus on race. 

And one of my dearest friends is African-American. She grew up in New Orleans in the 60s and 70s. She was bussed to a different school and experienced desegregation. She became a brilliant FBI agent. She’s far smarter than I am. I have the utmost respect and love for her. What unites us is our commitment to Jesus and his kingdom. She certainly doesn’t act like a so-called ghetto black person might. But some of her family members do, (more so than I might’ve expected.) However, that doesn’t threaten me in any way. We marvel and how the Lord has united our hearts and how it’s difficult for some other people to even understand that. She is a strong Trump supporter and a conservative, however, not a republican per se. She has cousins who are high ranking members of the DNC. She sees them as foolish and blind, just like we would. It’s far more about world view, and who the True king is, and what the values of his kingdom are than the color of skin. She often talks about the foolish pride of her wealthy and powerful black relatives who are so proud of being black. God hates pride, no matter what color your skin is.

	Do you think God created race? Or humans? 
	
	After all, we hate when someone denies the sex they are assigned at birth. We hate it because sex is given by God, and not changeable by choice.
	
	Isn’t it the same with race?
	
	Actually, I can think of nothing more beautiful than the many ways in which God has shaped men. The ways in which the land, the culture, the religion, and God’s own choices have shaped us are truly a sight to behold!

The pendulum has simply swung too far. I understand how young white men like you may feel discriminated against. In fact, you probably are. DEI and woke ism are vile, false beliefs, straight from the pit of hell just like true racism is. The alternative to woke ism not more racism or separatism. It’s becoming awake to the real truth of Jesus and his Kingdom. 

Are you familiar with theologian Michael Heiser? He’s one of my favorites. He points out in scripture what many of us in this modern age fail to see: The reality of two kingdoms on this earth. The Earth is currently ruled by the enemy and his various Spiritual principalities. The early chapters of Genesis hint at this, and several of the psalms show this too.  The ancient world understood that the so-called gods of other nations were supernatural beings that had certain powers. But God separated out the people of Israel, in order to display himself and his nature through them, and to show His supreme power and authority as the Most High God. And, to bring forth one who would change the order of things on earth, for all nations and people groups. Of course, that’s Jesus. Paul helps continue the clarification of this teaching when he admonishes Jews to not get caught up in genealogies. True followers of Jesus love people: male, female, Greek, Jew, slave, Free. and we are to be united together as different parts of the body with unique abilities and even perspectives, all of us focused on building up Jesus and his kingdom.

I would love to discuss all of this with you more. But I can’t really do it over text. Come visit us soon and let’s talk. This is fascinating. I appreciate how you ask questions and I do sympathize with some of your concerns.

I think God enjoys the unique diversity of his creation. All creation: plants, Animals and humans. I think our racial differences happened over time as a result of the fall of the tower of Babel and the peoples of the Earth being spread out and given different languages and different principalities to rule over them. I think God created our differences and enjoys them. I think the amount of melanin and skin is definitely affected by the amount of exposure to sunlight and the need to be protected from too much of it. This is why we see darker skinned people closer to the equator on continents like Africa south and Central America, etc. I think these adaptations happened over time and were directed by God for our best Good.

	Sounds good, we can definitely discuss it next time I see you. Might be next week.
	
	I’ll leave off with this:
	
	The idea of anti-racism seems to be the idea that we should judge everyone by the content of their character. Which you appear to agree with: you say that people’s character should matter more than the color of their skin.
	
	The Civil Rights Act is the incarnation of this philosophy, applied to everyone within America. 
	
	In other words, The Civil Rights Act is the idea that we should not care about anything which is long-term. Because that’s what an innate characteristic is. A man cannot change his sex, race, or even religion without a good deal of effort and consideration. Racially, of course, it is simply impossible. Even harder than sex - nobody is “trans-racial”. That’s because race takes multiple generations to form.
	
	Therefore, it seems race is the most determined by God of these characteristics, because it is the most outside of human choice. That’s an interesting observation.
	
	The second observation is that, for seemingly no reason at all, this government also said that we should forget about God. They said that as long as you are working, God must stay separate. They tell us, under threat, that the content of someone’s character is not related to their religion. Doesn't that seem strange?
	
	If a Christian business owner publicly says that Christians are more moral than non-Christians, which I would assume is a normal belief, what’s the next step for atheists? 
	They will find someone to act Satanic around this Christian in the workplace, such as pushing homosexuality, and then claim that Christian is violating the Civil Rights Act.
	
	"Don't ask, don't tell" - that's today's policy in corporations.
	
	Whites-only private schools were attacked and disbanded by the Civil Rights Act - why not Christian Schools next?
	
	The only reason they don't is because public support hasn't gotten there.
	
	Of course, they tell us - “these are Christian values, these are European values - we must judge everyone fairly”. And yet, the nation gets less Christian and European every year. If that is the result of our values, what exactly is going on? The people in charge, too, get less and less Western. All the while, they whisper in our ear to abandon the traditions (the biases) of our ancestors. "Race - religion - sex - who cares! Life is meant to be fun!”
	
	That’s what they led with, in the 60s. That’s how they got the Act passed - by using the enticement of immorality against the kids, and the barrel of a gun against the parents.
	
	So, in some ways, anyone who supports the Act is a progressive. You believe in the rapid change of values that has accelerated after WWII, becoming exponential, your only desire is to go back to a different point when the exponential decline had already started.
	
	When a race in a nation goes from 90% to 54% in 60 years, and a race in the world goes from 35% to 9% in 60 years, most people would say ”hey, there’s something unhealthy here. Why are our people declining?”
	
	That’s what the statistics are for whites. And yet, nobody ever brings it up. A white would never dream of making things about race - only a gloating liberal.
	
	The problem is, though, that nations are biological. And, therefore, the races which make them up are very important.
	
	If a nation is an organism, a real, biological being, then the health of the race is crucial to understanding the health of the nation. And, as we can see in history, this is true.
	
	It was exactly when the Roman birth rates fell that the Republic was overthrown, and an atheist empire was created.
	
	And then Rome fell, not through illegal immigration, but through legal.
	
	The riots that led to the sack of Rome were started by legal, discontented German immigrants.
	
	By that time, everyone in Rome was German. They said "who cares?" The support was not mustered, and so Rome fell.
	
	One would think, because no man was willing to risk his lives merely for "character", or for another short-term characteristic.
	
	The conclusion I came to, not just after facing discrimination but, actually, after sitting down in January 2024 and watching the country get invaded with the help of the sitting president, is that the reality is that the Civil Rights Act was, itself, from Satan. It was an attempt to disconnect Man from everything God gave him - everything man could not change by his own mind and desire.
	
	Race, sex, religion, and even nation - all banned.
	
	Sounds like communism, doesn't it?
	
	Man is a colorless, genderless, atheist animal. That’s how the Civil Rights Act mandates you to think - 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week. 
	
	Now, of course, they apply that logic to foreigners too. 
	And it represents the death of the nation. 
	
	How could we possible judge the entire world by the content of their character? Doesn’t that sound like… playing God?
	
	The idea that we, in our corner of our world, MUST meet every human who comes, and spend hours determining his worth?
	
	Doesn’t that sound globalist?
	
	If you believe in individualism, or globalism, or anti-racism, or anti-religious-discrimination - this is what you believe.
	
	Because, if we are successful, which I would assume is the point of a nation, people will come. And then we must judge them. According to these ideas, as an individual.
	
	That's what Churchill believed. When he ruled the world with the British Empire. And we adopted that belief when we won.
	
	But, physically, it isn’t possible. There aren’t the resources or the time to do it. The British Empire doesn't even exist anymore - since adopting that philosophy, they have lost almost everything.
	
	And, if it was possible, but merely costly, to judge every man on Earth - what would we be we saying to ourselves? That we are worth so little that we need to spend hours learning about every other race, religion, and culture? And if we don’t, then we can’t make a living?
	
	It’s no wonder the birth rate is down - how could it not be! Our value of our own people has steadily plummeted.
	
	That’s not what a great or free nation says (at gunpoint, remember) - that’s a conquered one.
	
	And what you all fight against now, as simple “conservatives”, is exactly what was signed into law 60 years ago. And you say you fight for Christianity, too - but that was also signed into law, 60 years ago. “You must be a globalist atheist in the workplace” - that is the literal translation of the law. And that law is what you are conserving.
	
	My belief - based on what I have discerned from most people - is that most people who speak against racism are not actually against racism. After all, almost every other race is more racist than us. Actually, our people are against secular racism, because that is the only racism we have known. That is National Socialism. 
	
	You are right, that secular racism (Nazism) is increasing. But the problem is that secular globalism and secular racism, i.e. Churchill-ism and Hitler-ism (who were both atheists), are two sides of the same coin.
	
	Each man was attempting to play God - Churchill by thinking that we should judge every man on Earth by his character, and Hitler by saying we should use technology to micromanage biology.
	
	It appears to me that there is not a way to completely divorce race from God. There is a reason why the Amish are all German. That's why I think that, even if Jesus ruled the Earth, race would still exist and would cross our minds. And that's not a bad thing - because racial differences are God's creations, and are really quite remarkable and interesting.
	
	Churchill won, obviously, but Hitler was right in many ways. He predicted the future better than any other Western leader. His resurgence is not necessarily evil. It is a natural correction, that we must now understand in America and find the true solution.
	
	My opinion is that the West began its decline with the Enlightenment, which was where separation from God and anti-racism really began. When I saw America getting invaded, I realized, on a personal, level, that I would like to live in a real nation. I realized that a real nation is better than a globalist empire. A real nation is connected to the long-term - it discriminates on nationality, on sex, on religion, and, yes, on race.
	
	Being in a real nation is something I originally got a taste for at Geneva, and the classical school I went to in Florida. In Florida, there were several years where it was actually 100% white, and at Geneva it was almost 100% (and almost all of the minorities became Democrats after - completely okay with invasion). Those were schools which both genuinely loved God, and genuinely loved the English people. And white people. And I find it impossible to believe that the experience would have been at all the same if it were mostly minorities. 
	
	Our people are going away so quickly, if things continue we will cease to exist. So it's an important decision. If we really love the English people, or the European people, we can't accept what's happening. If we want to have an environment like Geneva in any way, we can't accept it. War may well be necessary to restore Canada, America, England and the rest of Europe. The other nations are almost certainly not happy that we are getting more racist again - they were enjoying our decline.
	
	Recently, many young men have understood this. That is why we are racist. Once war begins, egalitarianism and "judging on the content of character" is not relevant. How can I judge an enemy combatant before I shoot him? Only innately by race, and maybe by religion or nationality depending on the uniform.
	
	Anyway, the Case for Christian Nationalism is a good book which also discusses this. By Stephen Wolfe.
	
	I'll finish watching that interview too.