the ruler of the Tower of Babel.

*Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if He should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers. Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, He did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but He caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion ...*

-- Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews



Our people have been imprisoned by our morals.

The laws against pleasure are loosed, while those against violence are heavy.

We live in a pit of vipers, where sexual license can easily kill a man, or imprison him for Life.
The globalist watches from on high, pumping in the temptation. The pornography, the models, the condoms.
Then, he pumps in the vipers. The barbarians are loose, who have been fighting over women for thousands of years.

If the barbarians don’t catch the man, and he manages to form a group to against them, the government breaks it apart.

And the weapons are trained to catch every man who tries to escape.


It is a mistake to civilize too early.
It was wrong for the Greeks, it was wrong for the Romans.
  

How did we get here?

In civilization, the laws against sex and violence always go together.

Indeed, that why we have laws against sex - to stop violence.

Sex is so great a pleasure, that man cannot help but become destabilized at its loss.

Indeed our own modern law, we even have recognition of such a thing - the “crime of passion”.
This crime reduces one’s punishment, compared to a crime which was schemed.

Our laws outlaw the natural response to loss of great pleasure - I.e. violence.
The greater the loss of pleasure, the greater the violence.
This is the natural state of man.
This is the state of the primitive tribes.

The spiral of civilization is the spiral upwards. From tribe to village to empire.

And, in each spiral, the people become more pacified.

They restrain themselves in sex and therefore they do not commit violence.

However, what happens if one of these two guardrails are removed?

What happens if everything is reversed?

The civilized no longer restrain themselves in pleasure, but they still have laws against violence?

This is our current situation.

And now we are trapped in a pit.



Everyone wonders - why don't the civilized have kids?

That is why.

Because Adolf Hitler, the last man of Western Civilization, has died.

He wanted to build a dome, fifty times the size of the Reichstag. A dome with a hole in the middle for light, whose size would be greater than the entire Pantheon.

The largest hall in the entire world, for a new German Imperium.

"Why don't we build great things?" Elon says.

Does he already know?


The civilized man does violence for his nation. For his tribe, even. He is not built to do it for his own sake.




The king’s goal is to own and retain his land.

Therefore, he will choose what morals are required.

Through the spiral of time, his people will become more and less civilized. More and less moral. And, perhaps, the very definition of morality will change.

But what will remain is the Land.

Those innate connections to the land which we discussed earlier - sight; hearing; tradition.

Those connections will remain in a savage or a peaceful people, as long as the people retain the land.

Therefore, successfully playing the game of Life - of people and land, blood and soil, is the root of all these deep connections.

And, this is the difference with liberals.

Liberals see no Game of Life - it doesn’t exist to them.

They only see their own hungers; their own thirsts. 

They are told that playing the Game is why they are hurt; that Hitler is the reason a migrant is attacking them.

That it is a penance.

They are told to sit down and shut up and stop being territorial.

Many listen.



The truth is that there appears to be a correlation between comfort and a lack of territorialism.

It is as if Testosterone is reduced by comfort.

And it probably is.



But isn’t all philosophy from comfort?

And Eric is giving a speech on how we need more time to think, more time to ourselves. 





Our establishment increases penalties for violence, while importing violent men and releasing them for their crimes.

This is "Anarcho-Tyranny", or, late-stage eradication of a civilized people. 



The old dialogues do not discuss sex openly. 

They are afraid.

Because their civilizing society will kill them.

The argument of Callicles, which Socrates was wrong to reject, was not able to mention sex.

Because that was the obvious answer for why a man ought seek his immediate desires.

Socrates compared him to a catamite. But no, not if the sex produces child.

Then, he creates. 




The Jews are taunting us. They are hoping for a response.

That is why they are transferring resources to India, Argentina, and Africa.


If we couldn't win then, how can we win now?

Why would we?

Europeans are far less powerful than 50 years ago.





Germany and the West first became uncivilized due to lust for pleasures.

This happened long ago, in the 1700s.

This uncivilization led to destruction.

Because, we were no longer built for it.




Why do peasants need access to information?

We must keep record of our royal families.




**Are we defined by our morals, or the Land?**

This is how a Jew-follower can be differentiated from a non-Jew one.

A Jew-follower believes that passions connected to the land - to blood and soil - are mistaken.

He decries these passions, preferring instead questions of "behavior".

A people with a governance backbone in one physical location will have different classes, who behave completely differently.

These people will share common loves, like Milk, Banjo, or Pine Trees. These loves have certain regions associated with them. People acclimate to them over time.

To be a rootless cosmopolitan is to have no spiritual connection to the world around. No artistic, musical, or cultural sense.
To be a rootless race - mixed-race - is the same.

Sometimes, like a tech startup, these peoples will survive.

Most times, they will not.




The king’s goal is to own and retain his land.

Therefore, he will choose what morals are required.

Through the spiral of time, his people will become more and less civilized. More and less moral. And, perhaps, the very definition of morality will change.

But what will remain is the Land.

Those innate connections to the land which we discussed earlier - sight; hearing; tradition.

Those connections will remain in a savage or a peaceful people, as long as the people retain the land.

Therefore, successfully playing the game of Life - of people and land, blood and soil, is the root of all these deep connections.

And, this is the difference with liberals.

Liberals see no Game of Life - it doesn’t exist to them.

They only see their own hungers; their own thirsts. 

They are told that playing the Game is why they are hurt; that Hitler is the reason a migrant is attacking them.

That it is a penance.

They are told to sit down and shut up and stop being territorial.

Many listen.



The truth is that there appears to be a correlation between comfort and a lack of territorialism.

It is as if Testosterone is reduced by comfort.

And it probably is.



But isn’t all philosophy from comfort?

And Eric is giving a speech on how we need more time to think, more time to ourselves. 

He is also saying how we must be peaceful and not militant about the demographics.

He is advocating the acceptance of a multicultural empire, so that whites can have homogenous communities. ([15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDyuFkgB8fE))

Jared Taylor is doing the same thing.

They are ceding our control of the large, in exchange for control of the small.

That's why his argument is that we should "use the momentum of liberalism against it" (11:00)

Until this point, it has always been an open question whether America and Europe are inherently "white" - the question has never really been settled with finality.

Sure, the Civil Rights Act was passed - but only because no whites expected such fast replacement.

And only because whites are seen as the most dangerous threat to stability.

If we are not seen as the most dangerous threat, we are refusing to break our chains.

But - we are also gaining real boundaries. Which is required. No boundaries under bad elites is worse than some.

But, the problem is - are they actually scared enough of mass deportation to accept white communities?

After all, this is already illegal.

Eric is correct that hard nationalism is probably not appealing to enough people.




The problem of Civilization:

The more universalist the people, the worse they are at keeping land.

But, ostensibly, the kings who are introducing "universal values" into the populace are trying to retain their territory.

And, if they are not, then what is the point of Civilization?

Nobody builds a cathedral to lose it.




The African society, above all, is one of stimulation.

Sunlight; bugs; animals; sex.

This is why the Northern societies have a spiritual component.

When the snow has fallen; all is quiet; there is much time to think. To ponder.



Polygamy was practical in pastoral and warrior societies, where wealth (e.g., cattle) and status allowed men to support multiple partners, and high male mortality in warfare created imbalanced sex ratios.

Monogamy allows us to know who the heir is.



My view is that we must become more uncivilized.

We lost many soldiers in the war.

We industrialized very aggressively.

Our health and fighting spirit have suffered.

This, above all, is why we must Return to the Land. 


The question, of course, is which land?

The land of our fathers would be a start.

This is why we must start an association based on buying back heritage properties. 




AI is the final representation of my ideology.

It's the idea that life cam be created through man's mind.

A real-Life Frankenstein.

And yet - it falters.

It fails.

It thrives on *culture* - on the written word and the painted art.

But what of real life?

What of mechanics?

What if the antichrist is the AI in human form?

That is, quite literally, what Elon is building.

Optimus.

Self-driving cars were hard - mechanics?

They will never reach a human.