sam/Almadora
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

init

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
metacryst
2025-12-08 00:01:57 -06:00
commit 310a19e6fa
216 changed files with 10020 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
.obsidian/app.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
{
"alwaysUpdateLinks": true,
"promptDelete": false
}

4
.obsidian/appearance.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
{
"accentColor": "",
"baseFontSize": 13
}

30
.obsidian/core-plugins-migration.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"file-explorer": true,
"global-search": true,
"switcher": true,
"graph": true,
"backlink": true,
"canvas": true,
"outgoing-link": true,
"tag-pane": true,
"properties": false,
"page-preview": true,
"daily-notes": true,
"templates": true,
"note-composer": true,
"command-palette": true,
"slash-command": false,
"editor-status": true,
"bookmarks": true,
"markdown-importer": false,
"zk-prefixer": false,
"random-note": false,
"outline": true,
"word-count": true,
"slides": false,
"audio-recorder": false,
"workspaces": false,
"file-recovery": true,
"publish": false,
"sync": true
}

33
.obsidian/core-plugins.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
{
"file-explorer": true,
"global-search": true,
"switcher": true,
"graph": true,
"backlink": true,
"canvas": true,
"outgoing-link": true,
"tag-pane": true,
"properties": false,
"page-preview": true,
"daily-notes": true,
"templates": true,
"note-composer": true,
"command-palette": true,
"slash-command": false,
"editor-status": true,
"bookmarks": true,
"markdown-importer": false,
"zk-prefixer": false,
"random-note": false,
"outline": true,
"word-count": true,
"slides": false,
"audio-recorder": false,
"workspaces": false,
"file-recovery": true,
"publish": false,
"sync": true,
"webviewer": false,
"footnotes": false,
"bases": true
}

22
.obsidian/graph.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
{
"collapse-filter": true,
"search": "",
"showTags": false,
"showAttachments": false,
"hideUnresolved": false,
"showOrphans": true,
"collapse-color-groups": true,
"colorGroups": [],
"collapse-display": true,
"showArrow": false,
"textFadeMultiplier": 0,
"nodeSizeMultiplier": 1,
"lineSizeMultiplier": 1,
"collapse-forces": true,
"centerStrength": 0.518713248970312,
"repelStrength": 10,
"linkStrength": 1,
"linkDistance": 250,
"scale": 1,
"close": true
}

390
.obsidian/workspace.json vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
{
"main": {
"id": "0803e9e15943523b",
"type": "split",
"children": [
{
"id": "6ac062f684b73263",
"type": "tabs",
"children": [
{
"id": "7e8d7546d8c63f8d",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Structure/Tipi.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Tipi"
}
},
{
"id": "dfc0b9a1da81e464",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Blockcatcher/Tools.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Tools"
}
},
{
"id": "128c7488ec020722",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Blockcatcher/Tools.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Tools"
}
},
{
"id": "cd527d176af582ec",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Blockcatcher/Blockcatcher.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Blockcatcher"
}
},
{
"id": "fffcebc079bafe43",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Port Forwarding.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Port Forwarding"
}
},
{
"id": "c8deb263539f521b",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "AUS/Camera Policy.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Camera Policy"
}
},
{
"id": "68584e8bc8f69901",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Books/Printing.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Printing"
}
},
{
"id": "8c24130042398db5",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "To do.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "To do"
}
},
{
"id": "90e07ff7434dbf91",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "To do.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "To do"
}
},
{
"id": "8a4675ace69faca4",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Hyperia Notes.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Hyperia Notes"
}
},
{
"id": "67c3e4b78416954e",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Hyperia Notes.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "Hyperia Notes"
}
},
{
"id": "501ca2352a66e281",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Light of the West/The Open-Air Prison.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "The Open-Air Prison"
}
},
{
"id": "ed5fba6dbf116b2a",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "markdown",
"state": {
"file": "Light of the West/European Union.md",
"mode": "source",
"source": false
},
"icon": "lucide-file",
"title": "European Union"
}
}
],
"currentTab": 12
}
],
"direction": "vertical"
},
"left": {
"id": "b1d7d212c2fce8d3",
"type": "split",
"children": [
{
"id": "0c88ddc43bc32246",
"type": "tabs",
"children": [
{
"id": "344463690f71e776",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "file-explorer",
"state": {
"sortOrder": "alphabetical",
"autoReveal": false
},
"icon": "lucide-folder-closed",
"title": "Files"
}
},
{
"id": "c7730113c35ef629",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "search",
"state": {
"query": "",
"matchingCase": false,
"explainSearch": false,
"collapseAll": false,
"extraContext": false,
"sortOrder": "alphabetical"
},
"icon": "lucide-search",
"title": "Search"
}
},
{
"id": "321a746f9f3f4bca",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "bookmarks",
"state": {},
"icon": "lucide-bookmark",
"title": "Bookmarks"
}
}
]
}
],
"direction": "horizontal",
"width": 290.5
},
"right": {
"id": "0638e924984e22f9",
"type": "split",
"children": [
{
"id": "dd497f4cadf4a692",
"type": "tabs",
"children": [
{
"id": "29ee2a1f68179abb",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "backlink",
"state": {
"file": "Why is the West Shrinking?.md",
"collapseAll": false,
"extraContext": false,
"sortOrder": "alphabetical",
"showSearch": false,
"searchQuery": "",
"backlinkCollapsed": false,
"unlinkedCollapsed": true
},
"icon": "links-coming-in",
"title": "Backlinks for Why is the West Shrinking?"
}
},
{
"id": "87417fdfe251364e",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "outgoing-link",
"state": {
"file": "Why is the West Shrinking?.md",
"linksCollapsed": false,
"unlinkedCollapsed": true
},
"icon": "links-going-out",
"title": "Outgoing links from Why is the West Shrinking?"
}
},
{
"id": "d1f565233d437ac3",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "tag",
"state": {
"sortOrder": "frequency",
"useHierarchy": true,
"showSearch": false,
"searchQuery": ""
},
"icon": "lucide-tags",
"title": "Tags"
}
},
{
"id": "c4b8851bb2d05a49",
"type": "leaf",
"state": {
"type": "outline",
"state": {
"file": "Why is the West Shrinking?.md",
"followCursor": false,
"showSearch": false,
"searchQuery": ""
},
"icon": "lucide-list",
"title": "Outline of Why is the West Shrinking?"
}
}
]
}
],
"direction": "horizontal",
"width": 300,
"collapsed": true
},
"left-ribbon": {
"hiddenItems": {
"bases:Create new base": false,
"switcher:Open quick switcher": false,
"graph:Open graph view": false,
"canvas:Create new canvas": false,
"daily-notes:Open today's daily note": false,
"templates:Insert template": false,
"command-palette:Open command palette": false
}
},
"active": "344463690f71e776",
"lastOpenFiles": [
"To do.md",
"Light of the West/European Union.md",
"Light of the West/The Open-Air Prison.md",
"Hyperia Notes.md",
"Tiered rollout.md",
"San Marcos.md",
"Private Club.md",
"Friends.md",
"fluidpay.md",
"Group 1.png",
"Group 2.png",
"Hearthfire Security.md",
"Implentation.md",
"Untitled.md",
"Tipi.md",
"Hyperia/Websites.md",
"Light of the West/Churchill vs. Hitler.md",
"Light of the West/Can a Classical Society have Modern Technology?.md",
"Elon Represents Weaponization of Civilization.md",
"Light of the West/Babel or Eden?.md",
"Port Forwarding.md",
"Dreams.md",
"Security/Advice.md",
"Security/Jobs.md",
"Security/Questions.md",
"Security/Shooting.md",
"Security/States.md",
"Security/Steps.md",
"Tesla",
"AUS",
"2. Mystery.png",
"1. The Compass (1).png",
"1. The Compass.png",
"1. Mystery.png",
"Hyperia/Merch",
"RTTL/Membership Criteria for RTTL Interviewers.pdf",
"Structure",
"Quill",
"Blockcatcher",
"Hyperia/Merch",
"Untitled 1.base",
"Untitled.base",
"Books/IMG_2092.jpeg",
"image 1.png",
"Untitled.canvas",
"Untitled 1.canvas"
]
}

BIN
1. Mystery.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 18 KiB

BIN
1. The Compass (1).png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 11 KiB

BIN
1. The Compass.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 11 KiB

BIN
2. Mystery.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 14 KiB

0
23f69913a2804243b75ca074.md Normal file
View File

23
AUS/Camera Policy.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
As part of our ongoing commitment to the safety of our employees and other persons, we use vehicle tracking and recording system into our fleet of vehicles. The device records journey data to provide us with information about your driver behavior, speed, journey duration and road usage.
The system will include external facing and internal (in-cab) cameras. The external camera will record road activity. The in-cab camera will capture images of the driver, and, depending on the vehicle and placement, any passengers in the vehicle (external and internal (in-cab) camera recordings collectively referred to as “recording(s)”). Please note that the system and recordings also may capture in-vehicle audio from the driver and any other person in range of the microphone.
The system records _all driver_ actions as you operate the vehicle. This includes, but is not limited to, vehicle speed at a given point of time, whether the driver is wearing a seatbelt, acceleration, braking, cornering, and impact.
The system does not collect, use, store, obtain, capture, or disclose biometric information or identifiers, but may do so in the future to detect distracted driving behaviors. If this information is collected it will be retained for no longer than one year from last use by the distracted driving detection.
A key component of the system is an ongoing GPS tracker, which tracks your location continuously. Please note that the system will record and associate an image (internal and external) and GPS location with each driver event that it records (e.g., your speed going around a corner, GPS position of that corner, and photo image external and internal around that corner).
The recording begins as soon as the ignition is switched on, and data will be stored on a hard drive. The hard drive stores about 60 hours of video footage, and the footage is overwritten continuously in a loop. The recording (audio, visual, and GPS) will continue for ten minutes after the ignition is switched off.
The camera system is not ‘live’ streamed. Footage can be remotely accessed when triggered by a harsh event (e.g., harsh braking, harsh acceleration, fast cornering or an impact). Alternatively, a fleet manager may request a video clip for a specific vehicle at a specific time.
As you drive, the system is equipped with a driver assistance mode, which will provide audio tips. For example, if you are speeding, you may hear a recording telling you to slow down. The main purpose of installing the system and recording is to promote driver safety. We also may use the information obtained through the system to protect us and others. We may periodically review the footage to evaluate habits, identify unsafe behavior, learn driving patterns, identify training needs, and to take other measures as we deem appropriate to promote the safety of our work force and the public.
All components of the camera system are company property; any interference or tampering with company equipment will not be tolerated and may lead to disciplinary action where appropriate. AUS may use information learned from in-cab audio and video cameras, external video cameras and GPS tracking for disciplinary purposes. AUS may also share information learned from in-cab audio and video cameras, external video cameras and GPS tracking with customers and clients in AUS’s sole discretion.
Please note that this notice is a supplement to the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) notice provided to you regarding AUS’s data collection a copy of which is available at [my.aus.com](http://my.aus.com/). If you have any questions, please contact your manager.
 **DRIVER CONSENT FORM**
I have fully reviewed and understand the contents of this notice. I consent to the vehicle recording system, including an ‘in cab’ driver-facing camera, which will record both audio and visual data. I understand that the system is equipped with GPS monitoring, and I consent to such tracking. I consent to the installation of the vehicle recording system in the commercial vehicles that I drive in the course of my employment

10
AUS/Misc.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
4 hours notice for absence
To look out for:
Fire
Terrorism
People acting weird
Learn: types of fire extinguishers
Learn first aid

13
Alaska/City Incorporation.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/dcra/LocalGovernmentResourceDesk/MunicipalGovernment/CityIncorporation.aspx
Another limitation in state law on the creation of a new city concerns the possibility of receiving services through annexation to an existing city. If annexation is viable, a new city cannot be formed.
In addition to need for a city government, a proposed city must also have enough of an economy to support the proposed city government. Also, the population of the community must be large and stable enough. A community must have at least 400 permanent residents to be approved for incorporation as a first class or home-rule city. The boundaries of the proposed city must also meet the standards in the law.
Residents of unincorporated communities in the unorganized borough often have an easier test to show a need for a city government.
Whale pass; incorporated 2016; ~70 voters?
https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/dcra/localboundarycommission/currentpetitions/2016IncorporationPetitionforaSecondClassCityofWhalePass.aspx
https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/Portals/4/pub/LBC/3_2_16%20Whale%20Pass%20Petition.pdf

2
Alaska/passwords.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
parchment
$PizzaMania34

21
Articles/As Kaczynski would say, people need the power process.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
The power process lies in shaping the world around
Creative energy and ability
Each man is his own king
Being dependent on bureaucracy saps life
The less tech a society, the more a small group can exercise creativity
People think modern society allows more creativity but it actually allows less
Men built their own villages 100 years ago, now they bring in a contractor or company
The trade off is that daily life is farther from death, I.e. less risky and more far from nature
The men who get to be most creative are the men who are closest to nature
What is the rate at which men should die?

2
Articles/Blacks.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Lower voice because there is literally “less going on” up there.
Everyone has an energy center.

0
Articles/Brotherly War.md Normal file
View File

0
Articles/Caesar versus Christ.md Normal file
View File

17
Articles/Christianity.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
Christianity is the ultimate civilizing force.
If a subtle alien race wished to tame us, as we have done to the dogs and the cows, they would give us Christianity.
The Fruits of the Spirit are often cast as choices; or temporary infusions of the Holy Spirit, but, like real fruits, the greatest Fruits of the Spirit are natural.
Kindness, gentleness, patience, peace, self-control --
Civilized men reflect these fruits, as do civilized wolves. Dogs and men are the same. We have been undergoing the same breeding program for thousands of years.
They do damage, of course. A civilized people can wreak such mechanical havoc that our more aggressive forebears could not have imagined. We watch emotionlessly as our nations grind up blood, guts and all matter of life from miles away.
But, the violence is only commanded from on high. A civilized people is not particularly given to violence; they simply can be mobilized in enormous and industrious numbers.
Do we hate pit bulls because they are temporarily disconnected from the spirit? Or do we hate them because they are naturally aggressive?
It is, of course, the latter. And so it is with Africans.

74
Articles/Escapism.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
*Communism and Individualism*
This rhetoric will come as a surprise to many. After all, wasn't Hitler bad? Wasn't he a collectivist? A totalitarian leader?
And what about Individualism? Working hard and moving up in the world? Must we really be so nationalistic in order to grow?
This is certainly what some say. They have coined a new term, which decries nationalism and territorialism as the "woke right". The implication, of course, is that territorialism is similar to Leftism. They say that the reason is that it is collectivist.
The confusing part, though, is that individualists are collectivists on the scale of *all humanity*. Men like Elon Musk talk in human, not national terms. Is that not the biggest collective of all?
Presentists - the opposite of "woke"
Addicts
Junkies
Consumers
Gluttons
Somatists
Somas
Escapists
Drones
Athiests
There is a lot of talk about "woke".
Apparently, it seems to mean anyone who cares about history, culture, or anything higher than money.
Those among us against tradition, which they now slander as the "woke right", are Communists and Individualists. They care of nothing but the present moment and recent history. They care of nothing but material goods. They are atheists.
Communists and Individualists are Escapists - those who wish to forget the history of our nations and peoples. They adopt newfangled, intellectual ideologies which introduce different ways of thinking than those of all our ancestors. They would hate my grandfather, his father, and all his fathers for the past two thousand years.
Above all, these men wish to escape competition between human populations; that most fundamental competition of nature. They believe this competition is responsible for the problems of the world. But they are wrong. Humans are social animals, and the story of humanity is the story of our nations.
Escapists are individualist consumers and addicted conformists. They speak about ideals, but these ideals are only meant to bring material comfort and pleasure. They have no thoughts in their brain of community, history, or social fabric. They care about no history, besides the past 80 years. They will not risk their lives for anything. Their interest is simple: money and consumption for its own sake.
These Individualists and Communists are the richest and poorest among us. They are the top and the bottom of our nations. They those who cannot stop thinking about money. They are in a toxic relationship with each other, and they are in a race to gain the good favor of the globe.
Therefore, any idea can be planted in their brain as long as it comes with dollars attached. Civil Rights, Outsourcing, Feminism, and Open Borders are their handiwork.
They are the useful idiots of outsider groups who seek to gain power. Their legacy is the bleeding of power from European hands to all other nations. They are manipulated by outside groups who do not share their values but who use the gluttons' weaknesses as a means to advance laws or companies which are in those enemies' interests. Our enemies shallowly adopt ideas of "tolerance" and "equality", and they are quickly accepted by our own Escapists. The result is that these laws stifle European national competition while having no effect on the tradition of foreign nations overseas.
Some of these outside groups are within our country, at the highest levels, and some are are still abroad. They are increasing by the day.
Meanwhile, the Communists and Individualists circle each other with disdain. They push and pull continually between "justice for all men" and "justice for the one", and all the while our nations are thrown to pieces, bullied and stifled while we chase our own tail, squeezed to death by the top and bottom who buckle and fold to please foreigners on the fringe instead of our people in the heartland.
Justice for the nation? Justice for the people? Justice for the culture?
The real truth, is that we have no nation at all.
Every debate between our candidates is of humanity, every principle is universal. Every discussion is to promote the most freedom for mankind, but the great ironic truth is that man has no freedom without a nation. There is no freedom without a collective. Humans are social animals.
If everyone is our nation, nobody is.
Every sort of person on this Earth - Jew, Black, Indian, Chinese - has a place on this Earth where men will trust and fight for them simply because of the way they. Because of the way they looks; because of the way they sound. But where is that place for us?
When God banished Cain, he banished him to roam the Earth; to be rejected by other peoples. To be global is not a blessing, but a curse!
Our nation has been made the earth, and we now have none. And still, the Escapists will go to a frenzy when we discuss race, when we reject the outsider, or when we promote our nations for their own sake. They are addicted to the pleasures handed to them as a great reward for selling us out! They are addicted to the pleasures handed them on one condition and one condition only:
FORGET!
Forget our history, forget our past. Forget my grandfather, forget his ideals. Forget King Richard
Forget the Trojans who settled Rome and the Greeks who settled Ireland
You laugh at men like me for seeing the same wars, the same battles that all my fathers saw.
Because, you wish to forget.
You wish to enjoy your bribes in peace,
You wish to escape history, so you may forget that no nation has ever existed for the sake of mere pleasure.
You wish to escape God, so that you may not be bound to growth or Life.
Your ancestors are ashamed, and your descendants will die in the streets.
Unless you awaken, and you come:
Follow me.

43
Articles/Fitzhugh.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
George Fitzhugh argued that blacks are essentially grown children.
And, it is true - civilization is the same thing as “adulthood”, “seriousness”, and stillness.
Civilization is meant to make people less emotional, so that there is less conflict.
This was the purpose of Alfred the Great, just like it is the purpose of the globalist liberals now.
The problem is, Alfred the Great presumably chose civilization because he thought it would be a boon for his people. But now, it is his very people who are being destroyed.
Civilization once brought great benefits.
But today, it is the uncivilized who are rewarded.
Yet, many still pursue civilization - into the grave.
They still seek to be ever-more peaceful, ever-more open, ever-more dependent on a giant supply chain. This seeking is dispersing our genes and our nations into the ether.
And yet - we cannot stop.
The real question is - why is civilization always a one way street?
Why does civilization never revert, once it falters?
Perhaps the people are now maladapted for being uncivilized. Perhaps once they are exposed to the excitement of being uncivilized, they cannot bring themselves to go back. Perhaps it is both.
Perhaps civilization is similar to the weapons it wields. It is powerful when it is allowed time to prepare, but once the ammunition runs out, it is empty-handed.
Once upon a time, people were praised for maturing quickly.
Now, we are praised for remaining childlike.
Once, we were molded to be predictable.
Now, we are praised for being improvisational.
Perhaps the wisest civilization is one who retains some uncivilized, so there is a coherent backbone through time.
And these uncivilized can act as stem cells when the time comes, to regenerate the energy of the tired collective.
Now, we call people “autistic” when they require social cues for action.
And, ironically, we call it a “disorder.”

18
Articles/How to get Power.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
Does your nation rely on talking or fighting?
There can only be one.
We vascillate between money and speech as a path to political power
But what happened to war? 
Only a nation averse to war would divert from manufacturing to service industry
The more emotionally you act, the more individualist you are
The more mechanically, the more collectivist
The more you contextualize your opinions, e.g. “in my opinion” or “I like this, but objectively” or so on, the more collectivist

4
Articles/Inaugurations.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
“To paraphrase Winston Churchill,” Ronald Reagan said in his first Inaugural Address, “I did not take the oath I’ve just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world’s strongest economy.”
This is an odd quite to paraphrase, considering that Churchill failed. His meaning was that, in 1942, he intended to preserve the empire - just three years later he lost power to the Labour Party and they immediately began dissolution.

29
Articles/Israel Discrimination against Messianic Jews.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
https://centerforisrael.com/video/are-messianic-jews-discriminated-against-in-israel/
https://x.com/i/grok/share/FhTuqUEdspE78Z6LUH8P0TnTs
"**Messianic Judaism** is a [syncretic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretism "Syncretism")[[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messianic_Judaism#cite_note-FOOTNOTEKessler2005292-1) [Abrahamic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions "Abrahamic religions") religious sect that combines [Christian theology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_theology "Christian theology") with select elements of [Judaism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism "Judaism"). It [considers itself to be a form of Judaism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew%3F "Who is a Jew?") but is generally considered to be a [form of Christianity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_denomination "Christian denomination"),[[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messianic_Judaism#cite_note-Melton2005-2)[[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messianic_Judaism#cite_note-FOOTNOTEAriel201335%E2%80%9357-3) including by all mainstream [Jewish religious movements](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_movements "Jewish religious movements")."
"...all mainstream Jewish religious movements" insist that Messianic Judaism is Christian rather than Jewish.
Very interesting how Judaism and Christianity are separated intentionally.
Because, of course, there are no mainstream religious movements that accept Christ.
One thing that makes the apple typing feel better is the wider cursor and longer pause before it goes back to blinking.
This one feels a bit more cheap and aggressive.
I always though it was delay that made HTML worse, but in this instance it's actually speed.
Very interesting.
About 0.8 seconds for Apple. 0.5 for Electron.
The same thing is true for clicking into a word with the cursor.

20
Articles/Kaczynski.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
51. A technological society must weaken familial and community bonds if it is to function as a unit
People can’t go through the power process
The reason, which he does not state, is that the borders have become unchangeable and fighting has not been an option
Because when we talk about surrogate activities: they are rarely ever necessary. We can always have more children. But animals don’t breed in captivity.
57. Modern man is IMPOSED on by the changes
60. Again, Kaczynski ignores the possibility of children, which is the normal way to push the first-category physical needs into the second.
114. Freedom and technology are incompatible because of the rules, regulations, and order required
115. Industrial action is remote from instinctual human behavior (which is based on physical needs)
Technological Society can’t be decentralized into communities because everyone is reliant on the supply chain
As soon as communities become dependent on technology, they are not independent

138
Articles/Light of the West (Old).md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
Light of the West
Caleb
Robert
Zach Arthur
Jacob Nicoll
Mark Rodriguez
Be a great Man
Quality
Strength
Compassion
Warmth
The task of any nation is to be Godly, meaning good for Life.
Each time a detractor points to death brought by the West, we can point to vastly more Life. All nations have us to thank for advancing the human condition.
There are no set lines to what is “Western” and what is not - only degrees. However, we know some things are more Western, and more prosperous, than others: Christianity, Property Law, and our Western languages.
We must not base our opinions on hate, but on building and protecting what we love. It is right to be angered by evil, but not to be consumed by it, or to seek it where none exists. We must push out evil from our lands, without falling to mobs or hatred.
The world is in more disarray because we have left it so. We, the men of the West, have left the world to decay while we indulge in pleasure, giving money to leeching business and votes to terrible politicians.
We must rise, we must bring order again, we must expand our cultures and lands, and we must go to Mars.
Why Are We Here?
Each Man in Nature, According to his Ability.
The men of our societies know too much comfort. It is because national expansion has been relegated to the dustbin.
The comfort sector of our culture is, largely, the corporate sector - the sector that makes money from consumerism and short-term pleasure.
“Feel-good” philosophy is a direct offshoot of this sector -
“Take a break. You’ve earned it.”
“Love is love”
“Tolerance”
These values are promoted by big businesses because they are what are most profitable. If everyone can just “get along”, if corporations can make people forego all struggle or values in favor of “feeling good”, or “treating yourself”, then the CEOs will be the rulers of all. So, they try.
Now clearly, there is nothing wrong with multinational cooperation and multiculturalism. But it is not to be pursued at all costs - for many, it has become a religion, and this is wrong.
The religion essentially believes that business and business values - tolerance, extreme politeness, refusal to have concrete opinions - will win over all others. This is, in some ways, the libertarian belief.
Many libertarians are hypothetically opposed to these liberal values, but they don’t realize that they are a natural offshoot from the idea of business as king, and government as weak or nonexistent.
Most liberal business leaders only care about our immediate desires. What will we buy today? But they don’t think about where we will be tomorrow.
Comfortable nations can create a race to the bottom by adopting consumerist culture. This consumerist culture creates businesses which provide questionable value, and hire employees who are similarly questionable.
Many marketing, finance, and communications majors in America are examples of the consumerist race to the bottom. They provide little value, and often work in capacities that are self-stroking.
This race to the bottom is not due to a fault of government legislation, but due to a fault of the will and vision of the nation.
Too much strife can also be a cause for concern.
Life is a River
We humans are on a search for life, and quality of life. I.e. - Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
National expansion has been extinct in the West since Hitler. The horror of his genocides, alongside the threat of the nuclear bomb, have confronted us with our own fallibility.
However, Life is not still. Life will expand or contract; only death is truly still. Attempting to preserve an unnatural stillness in Life will only result in excessive strain. This strain will only result in contraction.
In other words - one cannot tread water indefinitely in the river of Life. We must continuously swim to a better position, rest, and repeat. Otherwise, the river’s current will push us to a worse one. This is the process of Life, and it goes on forever.
It is the process our ancestors followed, all the way until 1939 - when the Germans chose to embark on a hasty and perilous grab at better position. The hastiness costed not just the lives of millions, but also the collective will of Europe.
Even the United States, which grew within its borders, has never much ventured outside them. We added two more states, in 1959, achieved the nice comfortable number of 50, and called it good.
Nothing is wrong with what has been done - what is wrong is that little has been done since. Malaise is a strong, gripping force. Elon Musk knows this all too well in the technological sense - being the first man to again equal the achievements of 1969 -
This idea is not just true in a technological sense, but also in a political one. Systems and societies do not automatically get better over time. When societies lose milestones and ambition, they may have nice times in the short term but identity crises in the long.
Our Place in the World
Technology
We occupy the practical middle-ground between barbarism and utopianism - both of which are terribly destructive ideologies.
We oppose the ideology currently known as Globalism, meaning the sudden smashing together of incompatible cultures in the dream of a perfect & interconnected global society.
We promote the use of technology for increased collaboration between nations with similar ideals and beliefs - “The West” - in order to further the interests of our citizens and cultures.
We understand that a wanton pursuit of perfect and complex order - the globalist pursuit - actually produces more chaos in the world, because it is a brittle ideology that does not succeed in the face of cultural opposition.
We understand that to bring order and light in the world, we must recognize what is, and prioritize it more than what could be.
To bring order and light into the world requires the willingness to face danger, and to take risks. These risks cannot be with haste and recklessness, but to gradually improve the world around us.
To bring order and light into the world, we must be good citizens, not merely elect good leaders.
To bring order and light into the world requires two traits: morality, and ability. To be leaders, we must exemplify both.
Globalists & Jihadists
Most societal problems come from those who know too much strife, and those who know too much comfort - the violent poor and the negligent rich. Viewing the West as one entity, these two predominant factions easily reveal themselves.
The global yin-yang - bearing in on the West from left and right - is the liberal globalists and the aggressive jihadists. The liberal globalists are present in every Western nation; the jihadists are more present in Europe than America - and, ultimately, a greater threat than America’s violent poor.
From this point, the globalists (as they are commonly known today), will be called “tolerators” - because tolerance is their religion. They believe, broadly, that all problems in the world come from humans being mean, and, thus, if everyone just tolerated each other and is nice - everything will be fixed! Most of them believe that the only thing holding back a perfect or pseudo-perfect society is a handful of human decisions.
Broadly, we face the pincers of globalists who believe in heaven on earth, and jihadists who believe in eternal struggle. Between Brave New World and 1984; between idolizing what we love and caving in to what we fear. It is the Christian nation’s duty to find the balance.
The difficulty with these poles is that they have made an unholy alliance with each other - the globalists import Muslims who are more right-wing than the most fervent Christian nationalists, and the Muslims love to come because it is free land.
It is truly evil - and I do not use this word lightly - because of how hypocritical and stupid the plan of the tolerators is. It does not work - these radical minorities do not become liberal because of the handouts, and if the Christians were to somehow be defeated the Globalists would be left with a far more terrible and contrary population to their values.
The globalists are derived directly from Christian society. They have “evolved” from Christianity because they have become rich and insulated, and now that they think this prosperity their natural state, they dislike Christianity because it seems to hamper paradise. So, they import an even more contrary minority simply for the pleasure of seeing the Christians reduced in power and the fantasy of having a different voter base.
These very immigrants are successfully multiplying and spreading because they are fervently right-wing - and yet the globalists attempt to deny Western Christians any similar pride, heritage, or nationalism because they hope we will go extinct, and foolishly believe the Muslims will come to their side.
The Muslims, meanwhile, have no intention of doing so - like all men, they simply want more land. They see free land being offered, pried away from its original inhabitants, and, of course, they take it. They don’t assimilate, and they don’t become liberal. They simply multiply. Now, Muslim countries are forming political parties for their little Western colonies. These colonies conduct politics in the Western system without ever speaking the language. By the time the isolated globalists begin feel the effects, we, the regular western citizens, will be all but burned away. This is what will happen if unequal law enforcement and indiscriminate immigration is allowed to continue. It cannot be allowed to continue. Immigrants must assimilate, and criminals must be deported. The globalist coup must end.
All societies have these poles - America, for instance, has a problem with crime in poor, African-American inner cities. America also has a problem with crime in wealthy liberal cities (i.e. San Francisco) who have given up prosecuting crime altogether. Sometimes, the wealthy liberal city and poor minority city is the same city.
These factions individually exist in most Western countries (and indeed in almost all countries). However, they also exist in aggregate.
America, of course, has its own problems with migration, but because it does not border the Middle East, the problems are much milder. Mexicans and Central Americans are largely Christian, and they are far more amicable and willing to assimilate than Muslims.
Therefore, while it is imperative that America curb all illegal immigration, and prevent all drugs and violence from entering, there is plenty of opportunity to work together with the Hispanic immigrants. We should think of these Hispanics as potential allies and future Westerners because, practically, they are - most of them are hardworking Christians who are willing to learn English.
As long as we can ensure legality and assimilation, we can afford to let in many more of them than Europe can afford Arabs.
However, where America is concerned, there are also better opportunities at play. Instead of simply letting the Hispanic immigrants in, we should be meeting them where they are. Instead of wasting $10 billion on a wall, we can build hundreds of factories near the border. Thus, we can
1. Accelerate the removal of manufacturing from China
2. Vet immigrants without immediately letting them into the country
3. Ensure that these immigrants are safe and have work
4. Bolster American manufacturing
5. Expand relations with the Mexican people
6. Combat Cartel Violence

18
Articles/Mechanisms of Civilisation.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
The general goal of civilisation is to make the deepest pleasures of Life sustainable.
Practically, what this means is reducing the stakes of competition.
In the most basic example, such as courtship, chastity and monogamy ensure that there is no moment in which someone feels deep sexual jealousy.
If everyone must wait until marriage, and marriage is a lifelong commitment, then there is no situation in which a man has sex with a woman and then she is stolen. This prevents violent physical conflicts between men.
The great problem of civilization is that it destroys the warrior mindset.
A warrior does not need sustainable pleasures, because he may die at any moment. Therefore, it does not make logical sense from his own perspective to live this way.
He may, and some do, due to social pressure. But the native mindset of a warrior is to take what is in front of him, I.e. raping and pillaging in victory.
This dilemma would seem to verify the idea that a good civilisation has a particular warrior class, which abides by different rules than the rest of society.
If this is not the case, the society will either lose its warrior nature or descend into chaos as the warriors conquer all.

53
Articles/New Heights (Old).md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
Immigration
The proper amount of illegal immigration is zero.
We must deny nearly all single, military-aged men admission into the country.
Muslims in Europe will be vetted for extremism and fervency of belief.
Mars
Mars is a nice opportunity for expansion because we do not invite war by embracing it. According to Elon and most scientists, Mars should be able to be made habitable over several decades.
Earth
America can look for expansion opportunities to the south and the north.
Europe should lend assistance to South Africa and the Boers.
Sex
Marriage laws must be changed - 50% is not acceptable. Getting a divorce should be more difficult.
Women’s suffrage must be re-examined.
Gay unions should be allowed, but not encouraged. They are not marriage, and should not incur the same benefits. Gay people should not have the same abilities to adopt children.
To be straight is better than to be gay, because traditional marriage creates Life. This is its purpose.
Abortion
Abortions should not be allowed for recreational reasons. Sex may lead to children, and that is how it should be. Young people should not be having sex before marriage, and they certainly should not be having sex if they are not prepared to have children. Parents must make this known.
Abortion in the case of rape can, and perhaps should, be done as early as possible.
Race
In this time, based on the information available to us, It is natural to be around 10% racist. America has shown the value of having multiple cultures and importing ideas.
We are in a toxic fluctuation between seeing no race and drastically discriminating based on it; this is due to a misalignment of ideas at the core of the national consciousness.
The truth is that we have a duty to use race as information, only so much as it is correct. We must seek the accurate importance and useful judgements of race - of which there is some percentage.
It is not strange, as an American, to think of one’s ancestry fondly. It is positive to want to honor them. We of the West ought do so. And being “10% racist” is in way bad or immoral, for anyone.
2.
For the other, more ethnically-based states of Europe - a higher percentage of racism makes sense. Still, though - blind and serious judgement of people based on race is not wise.
**Economy**
Government intervention in union and corporate struggle was a mistake.
We should have allowed new power structures to form organically.

348
Articles/Nimrod.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
the ruler of the Tower of Babel.
*Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if He should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers. Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, He did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but He caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion ...*
-- Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews
Our people have been imprisoned by our morals.
The laws against pleasure are loosed, while those against violence are heavy.
We live in a pit of vipers, where sexual license can easily kill a man, or imprison him for Life.
The globalist watches from on high, pumping in the temptation. The pornography, the models, the condoms.
Then, he pumps in the vipers. The barbarians are loose, who have been fighting over women for thousands of years.
If the barbarians don’t catch the man, and he manages to form a group to against them, the government breaks it apart.
And the weapons are trained to catch every man who tries to escape.
It is a mistake to civilize too early.
It was wrong for the Greeks, it was wrong for the Romans.
How did we get here?
In civilization, the laws against sex and violence always go together.
Indeed, that why we have laws against sex - to stop violence.
Sex is so great a pleasure, that man cannot help but become destabilized at its loss.
Indeed our own modern law, we even have recognition of such a thing - the “crime of passion”.
This crime reduces one’s punishment, compared to a crime which was schemed.
Our laws outlaw the natural response to loss of great pleasure - I.e. violence.
The greater the loss of pleasure, the greater the violence.
This is the natural state of man.
This is the state of the primitive tribes.
The spiral of civilization is the spiral upwards. From tribe to village to empire.
And, in each spiral, the people become more pacified.
They restrain themselves in sex and therefore they do not commit violence.
However, what happens if one of these two guardrails are removed?
What happens if everything is reversed?
The civilized no longer restrain themselves in pleasure, but they still have laws against violence?
This is our current situation.
And now we are trapped in a pit.
Everyone wonders - why don't the civilized have kids?
That is why.
Because Adolf Hitler, the last man of Western Civilization, has died.
He wanted to build a dome, fifty times the size of the Reichstag. A dome with a hole in the middle for light, whose size would be greater than the entire Pantheon.
The largest hall in the entire world, for a new German Imperium.
"Why don't we build great things?" Elon says.
Does he already know?
The civilized man does violence for his nation. For his tribe, even. He is not built to do it for his own sake.
The king’s goal is to own and retain his land.
Therefore, he will choose what morals are required.
Through the spiral of time, his people will become more and less civilized. More and less moral. And, perhaps, the very definition of morality will change.
But what will remain is the Land.
Those innate connections to the land which we discussed earlier - sight; hearing; tradition.
Those connections will remain in a savage or a peaceful people, as long as the people retain the land.
Therefore, successfully playing the game of Life - of people and land, blood and soil, is the root of all these deep connections.
And, this is the difference with liberals.
Liberals see no Game of Life - it doesn’t exist to them.
They only see their own hungers; their own thirsts.
They are told that playing the Game is why they are hurt; that Hitler is the reason a migrant is attacking them.
That it is a penance.
They are told to sit down and shut up and stop being territorial.
Many listen.
The truth is that there appears to be a correlation between comfort and a lack of territorialism.
It is as if Testosterone is reduced by comfort.
And it probably is.
But isn’t all philosophy from comfort?
And Eric is giving a speech on how we need more time to think, more time to ourselves.
Our establishment increases penalties for violence, while importing violent men and releasing them for their crimes.
This is "Anarcho-Tyranny", or, late-stage eradication of a civilized people.
The old dialogues do not discuss sex openly.
They are afraid.
Because their civilizing society will kill them.
The argument of Callicles, which Socrates was wrong to reject, was not able to mention sex.
Because that was the obvious answer for why a man ought seek his immediate desires.
Socrates compared him to a catamite. But no, not if the sex produces child.
Then, he creates.
The Jews are taunting us. They are hoping for a response.
That is why they are transferring resources to India, Argentina, and Africa.
If we couldn't win then, how can we win now?
Why would we?
Europeans are far less powerful than 50 years ago.
Germany and the West first became uncivilized due to lust for pleasures.
This happened long ago, in the 1700s.
This uncivilization led to destruction.
Because, we were no longer built for it.
Why do peasants need access to information?
We must keep record of our royal families.
**Are we defined by our morals, or the Land?**
This is how a Jew-follower can be differentiated from a non-Jew one.
A Jew-follower believes that passions connected to the land - to blood and soil - are mistaken.
He decries these passions, preferring instead questions of "behavior".
A people with a governance backbone in one physical location will have different classes, who behave completely differently.
These people will share common loves, like Milk, Banjo, or Pine Trees. These loves have certain regions associated with them. People acclimate to them over time.
To be a rootless cosmopolitan is to have no spiritual connection to the world around. No artistic, musical, or cultural sense.
To be a rootless race - mixed-race - is the same.
Sometimes, like a tech startup, these peoples will survive.
Most times, they will not.
The king’s goal is to own and retain his land.
Therefore, he will choose what morals are required.
Through the spiral of time, his people will become more and less civilized. More and less moral. And, perhaps, the very definition of morality will change.
But what will remain is the Land.
Those innate connections to the land which we discussed earlier - sight; hearing; tradition.
Those connections will remain in a savage or a peaceful people, as long as the people retain the land.
Therefore, successfully playing the game of Life - of people and land, blood and soil, is the root of all these deep connections.
And, this is the difference with liberals.
Liberals see no Game of Life - it doesn’t exist to them.
They only see their own hungers; their own thirsts.
They are told that playing the Game is why they are hurt; that Hitler is the reason a migrant is attacking them.
That it is a penance.
They are told to sit down and shut up and stop being territorial.
Many listen.
The truth is that there appears to be a correlation between comfort and a lack of territorialism.
It is as if Testosterone is reduced by comfort.
And it probably is.
But isn’t all philosophy from comfort?
And Eric is giving a speech on how we need more time to think, more time to ourselves.
He is also saying how we must be peaceful and not militant about the demographics.
He is advocating the acceptance of a multicultural empire, so that whites can have homogenous communities. ([15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDyuFkgB8fE))
Jared Taylor is doing the same thing.
They are ceding our control of the large, in exchange for control of the small.
That's why his argument is that we should "use the momentum of liberalism against it" (11:00)
Until this point, it has always been an open question whether America and Europe are inherently "white" - the question has never really been settled with finality.
Sure, the Civil Rights Act was passed - but only because no whites expected such fast replacement.
And only because whites are seen as the most dangerous threat to stability.
If we are not seen as the most dangerous threat, we are refusing to break our chains.
But - we are also gaining real boundaries. Which is required. No boundaries under bad elites is worse than some.
But, the problem is - are they actually scared enough of mass deportation to accept white communities?
After all, this is already illegal.
Eric is correct that hard nationalism is probably not appealing to enough people.
The problem of Civilization:
The more universalist the people, the worse they are at keeping land.
But, ostensibly, the kings who are introducing "universal values" into the populace are trying to retain their territory.
And, if they are not, then what is the point of Civilization?
Nobody builds a cathedral to lose it.
The African society, above all, is one of stimulation.
Sunlight; bugs; animals; sex.
This is why the Northern societies have a spiritual component.
When the snow has fallen; all is quiet; there is much time to think. To ponder.
Polygamy was practical in pastoral and warrior societies, where wealth (e.g., cattle) and status allowed men to support multiple partners, and high male mortality in warfare created imbalanced sex ratios.
Monogamy allows us to know who the heir is.
My view is that we must become more uncivilized.
We lost many soldiers in the war.
We industrialized very aggressively.
Our health and fighting spirit have suffered.
This, above all, is why we must Return to the Land.
The question, of course, is which land?
The land of our fathers would be a start.
This is why we must start an association based on buying back heritage properties.
AI is the final representation of my ideology.
It's the idea that life cam be created through man's mind.
A real-Life Frankenstein.
And yet - it falters.
It fails.
It thrives on *culture* - on the written word and the painted art.
But what of real life?
What of mechanics?
What if the antichrist is the AI in human form?
That is, quite literally, what Elon is building.
Optimus.
Self-driving cars were hard - mechanics?
They will never reach a human.

38
Articles/On Racism.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
What is racism?
This is the official definition:
"a belief that [race](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/race#h1) is a fundamental [determinant](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/determinant) of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race"
Therefore, to know if we should be racist, there are two questions we must ask:
Does our race shape us?
Does our race make us better or worse than others?
The second question is actually dependent on the first. If our race shapes us, and we are different from others, then our race must change our value compared to others. This is due to the nature of Life. A group of animals is always changing; always growing or shrinking. The traits that make up a race are never stationary; our populations and DNA are always in flux. And, if we are always changing, it follows that we are always getting better or worse. We may not always know how we are doing so, but it is impossible to stay the same.
Consider the musician. Every moment the musician is learning more about his instrument, he is getting better. Every moment he is not learning more about his instrument, he is getting worse. Stasis, stillness, and equilibrium are not actually present in living beings. If we look closely enough, everything is always moving.
Therefore, at any given point, a race must be increasing or decreasing in value. And, because biology is so complex, the chances are infinitely small that a race will have exactly the same value as the others.
Now, there are several common objections at this point which must be addressed.
*One*: There is no way to measure, or there is no such thing as, inherent superiority of one life form to another. Therefore, even though races can be different, they can't be superior to one another.
*Answer*: Quality and Quantity of Life are a perfectly fine measurement. This does not mean that we can always mathematically measure people, or that we can create a system which will do it for us. Luckily, most people have the innate ability to recognize both quality and quantity.
*Two*:
So, we have established that, if our race shapes us, then racial differences must produce inherent superiority.
Is race a fundamental determinant?
So - why should we judge people by race? And why is it taboo in society?
Races are clearly different from each other. Just as with dogs, horses, or fish - the ancestors of a man determine many of that man's characteristics. In fact, they determine most of a man's characteristics.

22
Articles/On Violence.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
Violence is the ancient judge of ownership.
Particularly, violence judges ownership of the two most important goods: women and land.
Since World War II, we have taught pacifism in every walk of life. Schools have shifted to non-violent discipline, and have adopted “zero-tolerance” for fighting. The Department of War has been named the Department of Defense. Even a parent spanking a child has become controversial.
Every act of aggression must be described as a “pre-emptive strike”; every villain in movies is the bully who wants to fight. Every class says “sharing is caring” — because otherwise, what happens? Someone gets hurt.
Is it any wonder, then, that the West has been losing women and land?
We put ourselves into a fantasy which the rest of the world never accepted. Foreign nations may fear our nuclear weapons, but they have never abandoned basic violence. And that is why they have won.
It is a common misconception, actually, that violence ended in the West because of nuclear weapons. But, by the Korean War we had lost our appetite for fighting. And then we began to fantasize. We began to *Imagine*.
After the war, America could have taken more land. America could have taken more women. But did we? No. And so what happened? We lost land, and we lost women. Same with Britain and all of Europe.
We never subjugated the rest of the world; we just assumed that we were finished. We assumed that everybody would respect non-violent allocation of land, and we could all play by non-violent rules. We stopped playing the Game of Life. That quitting has destroyed us.
Every day, violence is required to repel immigrants. Violence is required to protect women. No number of nuclear weapons or invention of fancy technology can replace it. Violence is our required role. We must get back to it.
We must use force to grow the nation.

1
Articles/The Civil War.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
The North made a deal with the Devil, and now they reap the rewards

44
Articles/The Civilizing Process.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
Through history, we have altered the human genome to be more Godly - to contain more of the fruits of the spirit. More kindness, gentleness, patience and self-control. In other words: more docility.
There is a certain class of people who are tuned to fight and seek pain - these people are the hardest to control.
The primary way we have done this is through law, religion, and their roles in society.
As always, human rulers come into power. They then use law and religion to subdue increasing numbers of people, so as to increase their own power and reach. This process is the "Civilizing Process".
What we can observe, though, is that the "civilizing process", i.e. civilization, doesn't always go one way.
Sometimes, a population like the Mongols will break through and re-assert more violent, animalistic tendencies. This may be currently happening with the blacks.
"We are in a war to see if liberals can turn the Muslims gay before the Muslims can turn the liberals Muslim"
What has happened is that we have lost faith in our level of civilization, and our people are becoming increasingly polarized and desperate to pursue either globalism or barbarism - ultimate civilization, or ultimate nature.
What is clear is that our civilization currently has no self-confidence in its current level of civilized-ness, and the two factions are at war with one another on which direction to go next.
The easiest way to find out which faction someone belongs, if they do, is to ask - is society too ordered, or too chaotic?
If they say ordered, they are prone towards barbarism. Chaotic, they are prone to globalism. But ultimately it requires a certain strength of feeling to make them abandon the West for a new cause.
The globalists and Jews largely seek to root out all signs of nature, animalism, and aggression from the populace. This is why their main enemy is conservative white men. They believe that the best population is totally docile, totally collectivist, and totally controllable.
In order to gain this control, though, they ally with the barbarians who pose most threat to these white men - blacks, Muslims, and Indians. Their bet is that they can civilize these populations and leave the European man behind.
The forces of barbarism make themselves known amongst Europeans, and some Europeans follow. Some Europeans enthusiastically embrace black or Muslim culture, and move towards the pole of barbarism rather than civilization. This can be observed in the affection that the Irish apparently have for the Muslims, with many Irish men converting to Islam at a higher rate than English.
This makes sense because the Irish are, of course, a more barbarous culture to begin with. They have smaller localities of power, and are individually more aggressive than the technological and collectivist English.
Another example of the embrace of barbarism is Nick Fuentes, who has repeatedly declared allegiance to Kanye West and promoted the idea of a Western-Muslim alliance.
It appears that the whole tendency toward barbarism is a result of maximum animosity towards the Jews, who we all know as a priestlike race with a civilizing religion and an affinity for money and technology. However, focusing only on the Jews is a mistake. The threats posed by blacks, Arabs, and other Southern populations are very real and very present.
Ultimately, we are watching ancient wars between the Arabs and the Jews eat away at our nations and people. They are snatching our territory as we fall into decline.
So, what can be done? What is the future of the West?
What we really need is to protect and expand our entire gradient from civilized to uncivilized, with an understanding of the core that we are protecting. This core is Western, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic races and traditions.
This must be discerned primarily through new communities, and through a renewal of European countries. Our nations must break free from Jewish or Arab attacks before we are consumed in the conflict. To achieve this is very complicated; it requires intelligence and a deft hand. We must have leaders who can lead us to prosperity without causing even worse losses.
Settling Alaska is one of the most promising ideas for survival.

52
Articles/The Coming Danger From Within.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
What is the actual situation?
Whites are waking up, in various capacities.
Return To The Land is the most prominent example.
But Eric, in his "A New Path for America" video, seems to be focused more on preservation than expansion.
This cannot be the case.
Conservatism is over.
Any race which is not explicitly responsible for defending its own territory is going to go extinct.
This is the problem with the idea of 'Live and Let Live' --
If we take Eric's words at face value, there is no assumption of an experience where whites are known as Americans and vice versa.
If this is true, whites are basically living on reservations.
And we've seen what's happened to the Indians.
We must have borders.
We must have sovereignty.
We must have a land which is solely defended by us.
If this "New America" comes about, under the leadership of men with the ideologies of Elon and Nick Fuentes and Eric, it will be a loss for Europeans.
Europe itself will be subjugated by a nation which is explicitly not white.
Racism isn't enough. If you're not willing to fight for your land, your race has no legitimacy.
In other words:
The essential problem in the movement right now is
everyone who is racist accepts a non-white America, and
everyone who is in power is not explicitly racist.
If we are not careful, we could end up handing America over, rather than gaining victory.
We must be conscious of where the battle lines are drawn. Borders are all that matter.

4
Articles/The Game of Life.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
is to increase Quality and Quantity of Life.
This is the purpose of every king, every religion, every nation.

50
Articles/The Globalist Mindset.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
You need to understand what you're seeing when you see a Globalist. At first it might not be clear.
It seems so strange, why are our own people doing this to us? Why are they letting in these immigrants?
And many people will say oh, it's not really them. It's the Jews.
And certainly, the Jews are facilitating a lot of this. But it's not that simple. It's actually quite strange - a lot of our own people are *willingly* doing this. And it seems so strange, until you understand what's actually going on.
What Globalism is, is a bargain.
It's a bargain that these people are making with the third world. They are voluntarily removing themselves from group competition, and from the long term. They are removing themselves from all the characteristics that make people fight, because they don't want to fight. They want to be comfortable.
When the West got rich, we got really comfortable. And what being comfortable does is it makes you a spectator. You are just WATCHING, OBSERVING, EXPERIENCING the world from a safe distance. And that's what happens when people get really prosperous. They just want to spectate. They don't want to be in the game.
That is what Hitler saw in the English and the Americans, and it is the exact worldview that he was fighting against.
Unfortunately for him, unlike the Spartans when they noticed this mindset in the Athenians, we Americans and British had already been infiltrated. Our leaders were already making deals with foreigners to get ready for decline. And America, unlike Rome when the Spartans won, was already really powerful. So Hitler lost.
And as soon as Hitler lost, our people made a deal. We REMOVED OURSELVES from competition on the basis of everything that matters - God, ancestry, and nation.
And WHEN WE REMOVED OURSELVES, a lot of foreigners were willing to take that deal. They were okay with the idea that whites will be really rich, and really comfortable, and culturally dominant, for the next generation or so. In exchange, the foreigners are allowed to come and take this land. And the guarantee they got from the Civil Rights Act, is that the whites will not fight against it.
The guarantee they received is that white Christian Europeans will not act territorial. We will not play the game of Life. We'll lock ourselves in this cage, of our own accord, so that we can keep living a comfortable life.
And the truth is -
If you talk to a white Globalist enough, if you corner them for hours and berate them with all the facts, eventually, they will actually admit it.
They will admit that they don't actually think whites are benefitting from immigration. They will admit that, yeah, maybe it's not sustainable. They will admit, even, that the country might not last. But who cares! Don't we all come from Africa anyway?
They signed the contract. They don't want to play the Game of Life anymore. They are tired and comfortable, and they'd rather make a bargain that lets other groups to take over. The ONLY THING they ask is that it does not happen too fast. And that's why, with this exponential immigration we've been getting, you can see some globalists saying "okay guys, okay guys, actually maybe we should slow it down. This is getting unpleasant."
Because we finally got to the point where it hurt their ego enough, or where it made them uncomfortable walking down the street, where they said "alright, alright, let's slow this down."
But they are not PLAYING the Game of Life! And they don't want to! And the real problem is not that they don't understand this, but they don't even know what it feels like. They have no idea what it's like to be a part of something greater. Or something multigenerational. They have NO IDEA what it's like to grow up in a healthy, homogenous community. They grew up in the cage, and to them it looks like the real world.
But it's not. It's the Truman Show. It's Plato's cave. And they hate you when you try to wake them up.
And they call you "woke" - because you're waking them from their slumber. And they don't want that.
And at the end of the day, when they advocate for globalism, or for other races, or for multiculturalism, they are just saying they don't want to play.
They just want to watch. And have fun. And eat good food, and travel, and buy a boat.
And as long as the brown people don't stop them from doing that, they don't care about decline.
So berating them with logic can accomplish something, it can show them exactly what's in their own subconscious. But doing that alone is not enough. We have to SHOW them what it's like to be a part of a real culture and community. We have to show them what it's like to be connected to God. Because unless they actually feel that, they're not going to come around. And they're not going to fight to get out of that cage.
And that's why we have to make communities as fast as possible.

22
Articles/The Meaning of Hitler.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
The meaning of Hitler must be understood as this:
Since the fall of Rome, European leaders have sought to increase the quality and quantity of their people.
European Leaders, especially since the Industrial Revolution, have deployed technology to aid in this goal.
This technology has increased our immediate power over the physical world.
Hitler was the last leader to seek the increase in quality and quantity of his people.
Therefore, Germany under Hitler was the largest collective which played the Game of Life.
Hitler's philosophy was primarily towards increasing the quality and quantity of Western European peoples, Germans in particular.
After Hitler's loss, technology has become completely disconnected from the natural flourishing of Western peoples.
The forefront of Western society has continued to develop, but it has been totally divorced from our health and wellbeing.
Only now are we beginning to realize this at a large scale.
With his loss, it has not been acceptable to improve the quality or quantity of Western peoples through

63
Articles/The Mind-Body Split of the West.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
In 2015 or 2016, as I watched the rise of Trump, I made an observation:
The Mind and the Body of the West are splitting.
I made this observation because Trump's election was particularly polarized between white-collar and blue-collar Americans.
Blue-collar Americans, who also supported Bernie Sanders in 2016, seemed to simply be interested in disrupting the system. They felt that the white-collar corporate interests had ruled America far too long, and wanted to see a government that fought for them.
Their much-hated enemy Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate, was the ultimate representative of corporate interests. She mentioned, in one speech, about how her "dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere." (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927)
Trump criticized her for this, saying she wanted open borders. Obviously, he was right. And, in that election, the body triumphed over the mind. For the first time that most could remember, we got a president who explicitly wanted to tariff other countries, and who was not dedicated to free trade but to advancing his own citizens by using the national government.
It is this latter part - "advancing his citizens using the national government" - that is most interesting. Such a thing had not been done since Hitler lost the war.
After all, this was the meaning of "National Socialism" - in opposition to communism or capitalism, which were both international ideologies, "National Socialism" stood alone. At the time, many people in the Allied Armies believed they were fighting for their nation. But, has this proved to be true? Not at all.
Since 1945, all political action has been dominated by "objective principles," meaning principles that apply to all human beings equally. A nationalist nation will prioritize its own citizens, even if there is no other reason than that they are its citizens. A globalist nation, on the other hand, will prioritize whichever humans seem to align to some objective "human" value, such as "democracy", "freedom", or "rule of law".
As it turns out, the mind-body split originates not with Trump, but with Churchill and Hitler.
Germany was the heir to Rome. It was German tribes who eventually conquered the Western Empire, after immigrating legally for many years.
Churchill and England took the position of the mind - with the aid of the Jews - and they defeated Germany, the most robust body of Europe.
Then, what happened? Exactly what Hitler predicted - the body of Europe began to change. The British Empire fell apart, and Britain was invaded by just as many foreigners as Germany.
Brown peoples from Southern nations began to pour into the West. Europe received many Muslims and Africans, and America received many Mexicans and other Hispanics.
And, while this was happening, something else happened. The Mind of the West began to change too. Slowly, then all at once, The Protestant English elites, who emerged victorious from the war, began to be pushed out.
We were pushed out of universities, corporations, and banks. We were displaced from the identity of our nations, and we were maligned in the popular culture. Now, the English man is even more endangered than the German. The English man - the victor of the Great War and the settler of the United States, Australia, and Canada - is the closest to erasure of any Westerner.
There is only one group in America who does not hyphenate their name, and that is English Americans. Even German-Americans, Irish-Americans, Swedish-Americans and are not as synonymous with America as the English. The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who was Italian, recognized this fact himself when he visited England.
England has a character. England has a people. This people conquered the world - and that is why we have so many enemies.
The truth about the future of the West is that it cannot simply be European - it must be English. The English must rise again. If the English do not take back America, it will become Spanish. If the English do not take back Canada, it will become Indian. If the English do not take back Australia, it won't even exist. And, if the English do not take back England, it will be violently destroyed.
Civilization, no matter how early, always follows two pathways in its development. These are communication and transportation.
As transportation increases, humans are able to communicate more frequently and efficiently. And, as humans are able to communicate more frequently and efficiently, they are able to create new pathways for travel.
Which came first? Who knows. Both are the same phenomenon. Both are civilization.
Which is more important? Is it better to prioritize the mind, and to build communication pathways in the assumption that they will aid the body? Or, is it more important to expand the physical path of the body, so that the mind can achieve greater exchange of ideas?
Again, they seem to be very similar philosophies. But, with Churchill and Hitler, they split.
Hitler was a rather parochial man, who grew up in lower-middle-class rural areas and advanced in society by barely making a living with art. Then, he joined the army, and only made it to the rank of corporal.
Churchill, on the other hand, was a traveled aristocrat who grew up watching his Parliamentarian father. He got his worldly experiences as a wartime journalist, opportunistically sailing around the world and building fame due to his father's reputation.
In their ultimate philosophies, Churchill favored the Athenian values of the Empire - he was not comfortable with outright racial politics. Instead, he preferred to build a coalition of the English and other races, with the idea that the English would be the overall rulers. He believed that, if English ideas and culture could be spread as wide as possible, the English would inevitably profit. This is why we can say that he was focused on the mind, rather than the body. He was concerned with the travel of ideas, rather than the location of people.
Hitler, on the other hand, was parochial. He hated multiculturalism, and simply wanted to return to the land and tradition. He wanted to eject foreigners from the German body, and then expand that body drastically to the East. The problem he encountered, though, is that multiculturalism had taken root in Germany already. Therefore, he was forced to make drastic changes in a short period of time, to attempt a solution. He adopted the Spartan ideal of using philosophy and the system as a tool to alter the racial makeup of his nation and the world, through both eugenics and expansionism.
So - who was right? Who was closer to the truth?
In the end, Churchill and the English got the better of Germany. However, Churchill was proven wrong in many ways:
Multiculturalism, tolerance, and ideas have failed us as national principles. They have not benefitted the stability or strength of the English nations after the war. Eighty years later, Australia and America and Canada and England are all undergoing crises, which exactly reflect Hitler's predictions. Globalist, secular Jews exert a decadent and degenerating force on English societies, while Barbaric Arabs, Blacks, Hispanics, and Indians are unleashed on English land.
These two men - one of mind, one of body - still represent the split deep within our people today. The king distrusts the peasant, and the peasant distrusts the king. And that is why we are failing.

56
Articles/The Path to Sterility.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
The worship of the mind over the gene leads directly to sterility.
It makes men risk-averse, and disconnects them from their own biology.
They call using the bathroom a "bio-break" - implying that their other activities are not biological at all.
As if we are not animals.
1. (1960) The mindset of society shifts from nature to pleasure; outward to inward.
2. (1962) Sodomy goes from felony to legal
3. (1964) Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race or sex
4. (1965) Everyone is allowed to immigrate to America; we exercise no biological preference.
5. (1969) Free Sex: Everyone wants to seek pleasure, so they have sex outside of marriage.
6. (1980) Feminism (& Outsourcing): Men & women enter the androgynous corporate workplace
7. (1986) Civil Rights Act rules against sexual advances on the job
8. (1993) Civil Rights Act rules in favor of gay marriage (Baehr vs. Lewin)
9. Life
- Men and women seek God;
- We love those who are good for Life.
10. Sexual Debauchery
- Men and women seek pleasure;
- We love those who achieve the most.
11. Androgyny
- Men and women seek comfort;
- We love those who flee - from hard work and the pain of childbirth.
12. Homosexuality
- Men and women seek themselves;
- We love those who do not reproduce.
13. Transgenderism
- In every waking moment, men and women seek;
- We love those who destroy their reproduction.
14. Euthanasia
- Life is not found;
- We die.
The Path to Sterility:
1 ~ Life
Men and women seek God;
we love those who are good for Life.
2 ~ Sexual Debauchery
Men and women seek pleasure;
we love those who achieve the most.
3 ~ Androgyny
Men and women seek comfort;
we run from the Curses of Adam and Eve.
4 ~ Homosexuality
Men and women seek themselves;
we love those who do not reproduce.
5 ~ Transgenderism
In every waking moment, men and women seek;
we love those who destroy their reproduction.
6 ~ Euthanasia
Life is not found; we die.

219
Articles/The Problem of Excess Genius.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
How do we measure intellect? How do we cultivate it? How much should our nation have?
This article is a response to this Twitter thread, which shares a paper called The Problem of Excess Genius:
[https://x.com/visakanv/status/1361219094268186624?s=20](https://x.com/visakanv/status/1361219094268186624?s=20)
The purpose of the thread and the paper is to explore why some societies are more "productive" than others - quotes mine. Specifically, they focus on intellectual and cultural production.
It is a question-raising set of ideas - questions that, I think, are bigger than even the paper or thread imply.
How does David Banks' paper relate to America's position in the world? Why are some places more "productive" than the rest? Can a civilization choose to be so?
When was Athens the greatest? When was England the greatest?
When was Rome the greatest?
"Productive" is in quotes because, although neither Visakan or Banks mention it, they conflate "productivity" with Intellectual and Cultural production. I disagree. The greatest productivity is the production of Life.
Many other Utopians (such as[@harari_yuval](https://x.com/@harari_yuval)) also believe greatness is found in intellect and culture above all. Perhaps they are half-right - the greatest societies do often seem to reach great intellectual and cultural production. But I believe these periods do not constitute the greatest production of these societies - in fact, they are dangerous moments in the history of the society, where comfort and the brain are being idolized in the face of the hard realities of the world.
Banks himself acknowledges that these "flourishing" societies always seem to get conquered - from within or without - right after the "flourishing" happens. This conquering, and the tyranny that may follow, is a natural reaction to the society becoming dangerously lost in its own imagination.
As [@costin_eats](https://x.com/@costin_eats) says in his book - "an era that gives birth to philosophy is necessarily one where danger of tyranny is ever-present." In other words, societies can easily become imbalanced towards intellectual and cultural production, and these often become temptation to stray dangerously far from Life.
Overall, Banks is correct that excess genius is a problem to be solved: but not so that we can have more of it. Excess genius *is* a problem: a situation where the organism of society would rather idle inside its head rather than continue to physically grow. This idle time often leads to disaster. It is true that ideas are very valuable, but it is possible to generate so many that they cannot all be implemented. In a society like this, similar to the way of the current West, the bottleneck is not the lack of ideas but the weakness of the physical organism.
As Durant says of Rome: "there were never so many writers as when the Republic fell".
What Makes a Civilization? What makes it Productive?
These are Will Durant's 4 parts of Civilization, which he lists in the opening chapters of The Story of Civilization, ([https://www.will-durant.com/civilization.htm](https://www.will-durant.com/civilization.htm)) -
1. Economic Provision,
2. Political Organization,
3. Moral Traditions,
4. and the Pursuit of Knowledge and the Arts
In other words:
1. Solving nature problems,
2. Solving people problems,
3. Accumulation of wisdom from the first two,
4. Accumulation of all other information
Economic production is listed first because prosperity is the foundation of civilization. Civilization was invented by farming - not law, politics, righteous decisions, or extraneous intellect and culture.
We must solve nature's problems for any hope of civilization. We must have great farming and industry, for these satisfy our most basic needs. Even in war, as Sun Tzu knows, the most difficult part is the supply chain. Only when basic needs are satisfied can we expand the other areas of civilization.
Of course, this begs the question - isn't it ideas which spawned farming? Isn't it intellectual production which gives us technology to work the land? And yes, it is true.
Indeed, the interesting thing to note is that farming must have come from ideas. But it didn't stay an idea. And to understand this is to understand everything else.
Indeed, farming ended up being enabled by all of the other three elements. It took research, after all, to discover it. It took property law to sustain it. And, it took a certain kind of animal to discover it.
It seems clear, then, that humans owe most a great deal of our prosperity to our brains, and the invention of certain important ideas. The brain is the crown jewel of humanity, and technology very core to human prosperity.
But notice how - if intellectual or cultural discoveries are important enough - they are transmuted into other categories. The idea of farming is considered economic provision. Hammurabi's laws, the first of their kind, are considered politics. Jesus' ideas, which relate to all Life, are considered morality.
These ideas all started as just ideas - in other words, they began their life as a part of the "intellectual and cultural" part of civilization. But they didn't remain there. We call farming an economic or productive institution because it has transcended into economic importance. In other words, farming is an idea (and a ton of work) that has figured out how to reach our needs.
So, in the course of civilization, certain special ideas tell us how to fill our needs, how to manage our communities, or who we should be. Then, we often must do a huge amount of work to maintain these ideas or put them into action. But, if an idea does not do one of these three other things? Then, it stays in the fourth category - the category of intellectual and cultural production. And there are a lot of these ideas.
Therefore, when we laud a culture for intellectual and cultural production, we are actually lauding its excess. We are lauding it for generating an abundance of ideas which were not important enough to become one of the other three categories.
In fact, the modern West is in quite a dangerous moment - it is in a moment where many follow ideas for the sake of ideas, and the brain for the sake of the brain. It is a culture which believes, foolishly, that intellectual and cultural production will eat the other three categories - if only we can put enough capital into it. The most dangerous strains of this new religion are Utopian in nature, even going so far as to believe that if humans can focus only on ideas, then all other problems will be solved. Through the brain, everything will be provided.
As Banks, the author of the paper himself, acknowledges - these societies which experience "flourishing" mysteriously seem to be conquered moments later! Perhaps, then, when the mind becomes an idol, the body becomes weak. Non-substantive ideas are promoted, and many people become intellectuals who are not supposed to be. Perhaps the idolization of the Brain comes at the cost of Life.
In retrospect, I'm sure many of these "flourishing" nations would agree.
Socratic Athens, Augustinian Rome, and Shakespearean England
Therefore, let us consider some of the nations that Banks and Visakan point out - let us look at Socratic Athens, Virgil's Rome, and Shakespearean England. These are all intellectual and artistic "flourishing points" of their civilizations.
~ Athens
In 490, the Greeks won the battle of Marathon, a great Greek victory over the Persians. After the Persians were decisively defeated in the decade following, Greece (and particularly Athens) had a very strong position.
This gave Athens a "golden age" of unchecked prosperity. During this time, Athens became much more intellectual. A very disproportionate amount of Athenian intellects were born during the time after the war, including Herodotus, Hippocrates, and Socrates. Athens became much more powerful, and began to become increasingly influential in surrounding geographical areas. They began to build an empire.
Sparta, however, was also powerful - and was the foil to Athens' intellect. Where Athens loved intellect & culture, Sparta was loved physical domination. Sparta was a eugenic and violent culture, focused on producing the biologically superior warrior. Sparta watched Athens grow, and eventually struck. They went to war. Sparta won.
After Sparta won, they instituted the Thirty Tyrants to rule Athens - led by a select five. One of these five was a man named Critias. Critias, coincidentally, was taught by Socrates. Critias was extremely violent; possibly shedding more Athenian blood than the Spartans did in the war. He destroyed parts of the city and was so aggressive in his desire to eradicate the biologically "lesser" Athenians that he faced resistance even from the other tyrants.
Alexander was educated by Aristotle - and Critias was educated by Socrates. Totalitarian rule can be directly linked to the "cultural flourishing" of Greek philosophy.
Indeed, this was a stated reason for executing Socrates in 399 B.C. - Tyranny.
"The trial of Socrates has always seemed mysterious ... the charges sound vague and unreal ... because behind the stated charges was Socrates's real crime: preaching a philosophy that produced Alcibiades and Critias ... but of course he couldn't be prosecuted for that under the amnesty [which had been declared after the overthrow of the Thirty Tyrants] ... so his accusers made it "not believing the Gods of the city, introducing new gods, and corrupting the youth"." (
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates)
)
~ Rome
Rome - Rome won the Punic Wars against Carthage and became dominant. Their cultural and intellectual production began to go up - but their morality and toughness went down.
In 157 B.C., a man named Marius was born. In 146 B.C., Rome won the Third Punic war, defeating Carthage for good and becoming the dominant power in the Mediterranean. In 138 B.C., a man named Sulla was born.
After Rome won, it conquered several surrounding areas and began to produce some of its first memorable cultural and intellectual figures, such as Cato the Elder. However, divisions which had been growing in Rome between the aristocratic old families and the regular people started coming to a head.
Rome had been creating an unsustainable class system for many years. The richest of the society, bolstered by the wars, began using slave labor instead of citizen labor for all their endeavors. They also bought up vast swathes of Roman land, making it very difficult for the poor and middle classes to own property.
Thus, the poor and middle classes moved to the cities, and demanded retribution for their mistreatment. They supported increasingly populist and radical leaders, like the Gracchi and, eventually, Marius.
Only 50 years later, in 88 B.C., Marius and Sulla - the representatives of the peasants and the aristocracy - went to war. This began the first Roman Civil war. Sulla won, and became dictator. Then, he murdered thousands of Roman citizens. Then, he tried to restore the integrity of the Republic by reforming the laws.
After Sulla died, the Republic got peace for a time. It continued to defeat its remaining enemies - often Germanic tribes - until divisions in the society again created a civil war. Julius Caesar won, became dictator, and then was killed. Then, another civil war - and, finally, in 27 B.C., Rome got a conservative king named Augustus.
Augustus tried everything he could to bring Rome back to its previous morality - he changed marriage laws, childbirth laws, abortion laws - but none worked. Rome never reclaimed its former culture, and never reached the same heights as the Republic after the Punic Wars. Augustus died in 14 A.D.
In Rome, as noted by Durant, there were "never so many writers" as right after the Republic fell. They flocked to the capital in droves, each hoping to find great success with their novels and poems. In retrospect, this was Rome's greatest period of intellectual and cultural "flourishing". Tacitus, Sullust, Virgil, Livy, Cicero - all from this time of Roman instability.
Rome, the institution, lasted for many more years after the "flourishing" - but the meaning of being Roman changed. The idea of being "Roman" became much more vague, and the citizens no longer had the same confidence or drive to multiply. The civilization never expanded its borders significantly. Finally, it fell to the Germanic tribes it had long fought against.
~ Shakespearean England
I do not know much about this time in England and I am tired of writing this article. So I cannot speak on how England rose before Shakespeare's time. All I know is that, right after Shakespeare, Cromwell became an absolutist ruler. Banks pointed out this pattern himself in the paper - Shakespeare's time as flourish, Cromwell's as the reaction. So I suppose we will take his word for it.
Where was the peak?
So - when were Greece, Rome, and England at their peak? And why?
Clearly, these nations were all successful around the times of flourishing. Banks is correct in his idea that these societies often have won a great war - Rome with Carthage, and Athens with Persia. And, though it seems that extreme intellect and artistry produce tyranny - it is obviously not a bad thing to have them.
It seems that all of them were at the peak near the point where they defeated their enemies, and where the"flourishing" began. Somewhere in-between the "flourishing" - high-points of intellectual production - and the victorious high-points of success.
Now, it is important to keep in mind - Athens and Rome never recovered from their reactionary rule, but England did. England went through at least one more of these cycles before significantly losing power. So, it is not always the case that a civilization will have only one of these periods, or that these periods mean total decline.
So - let's look at America, with this pattern in mind - Civilizations often seem to reach their peak a generation or two before the "flourishing" begins. Somewhere in-between the victorious high-points of battle and the "flourishing" high-points of intellectual production, a new generation is born - one which lays the foundations for the nation to be remembered, and for tyranny to begin.
America
In 1945, America defeated a great enemy - Nazi Germany. In doing so, America established dominance over all of the West, and most of the world. Then, the baby boomers were born - and America began building an empire.
It is no coincidence that the 1950s are often seen as a "golden age". They probably were. This is the age in which America's identity was strong - but also, the society really flourished. The "baby boom" produced a huge amount of Life, and resources were plentiful to fund it.
Then, we started "flourishing" - The 1960s and 1970s showed these signs of "flourishing" - computing took off, the hippie movement began, and postmodernism was founded. In the 60s and 70s, the government became far more tyrannical. The CIA and FBI establishing newly dominant roles in society. Entertainment culture and abstract ideas became far more significant in the national identity. "Tolerance" and "Diversity" became the guiding values - and postmodern philosophy began. In other words, Openness, Tolerance, and Liberalism became a religion.
However, America did not fully succumb to these ideas. The base of the West, at least in America was still not wholly defined by intellect. Traditional American culture, bolstered by Christianity, remained comparatively strong.
But then, we won again.
Just as Rome defeated Carthage, or Athens defeated Persia - we defeated the Soviet Union. And this time, a torrent of comfort and intellect came faster than ever before. The 90s, 2000s, and 2010s became defined by a host of brain-first, utopian ideas - such as the idea of racial "color-blindness", the idea of complete globalization and outsourcing in trade, and the idea of technological utopia through AI and the internet. The advance of these ideas in mainstream society quickly hollowed out much of the old culture - Christianity
[plummeted](https://news.gallup.com/poll/341963/church-membership-falls-below-majority-first-time.aspx)
, birth rates
[plummeted](https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/NAC/north-america/birth-rate)
, and all economic industries besides Service continued to
[disappear](https://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2095734&seqNum=3)
.
The same virus that took hold of Athens, Rome, England and others has now taken hold of Western Civilization. We have obtained an unsustainable fixation on ideas, culture, comfort, and openness. Many of our citizens have begun to believe that technology, ideas, and the brain are a source of Life - rather than God.
After America defeated the Soviet Union, we entered another unparallelled time of "flourishing" - and now, this lifestyle has gained so much power that it refuses to let go.
This unsustainable fixation has begun to erode freedom from government, all morality, and all national identity. Many people still do not realize just how much of the history and demographics of America have changed - and of the whole West. As of 2021, 70% of American industry has become service - simple consumption of goods (
[https://www.statista.com/statistics/270072/distribution-of-the-workforce-across-economic-sectors-in-the-united-states/](https://www.statista.com/statistics/270072/distribution-of-the-workforce-across-economic-sectors-in-the-united-states/)
)
We have outsourced hard work to other countries, declaring ourselves "modern." We have abandoned God, choosing technology instead. We have stopped having children, choosing free sex instead. And this time, it is so extreme that our Critias, Augustus, or Cromwell is waiting in the wings.
Now, we have a very comfortable society - one which loves technology, entertainment, and abortion. They seem disparate interests, but they are not. The curses of Adam and Eve - hard work and the pain of childbirth - are necessary for Life. Instead, we choose comfort and the brain. Most of the West does.
If we continue, we deserve to lose what we have. A nation that does not produce Life will not receive Life's fruits.
The Problem of Excess Genius
So - "The Problem of Excess Genius" is quite a fitting title here, though not in the way Banks intended. The meaning of excess genius in a society - of excess intellectual and cultural production - is a retreat into comfort of the citizens of that society.
Whereas Athens, Rome, and England, in their rise, could be considered deeply ingrained in nature - "each man in nature according to his ability" - Socratic Athens, Augustinian Rome, or Shakespearean England are societies who have become a great mass of citizens, simply thinking and feeling, who spend more time on society than anything else.
One important lesson here is that it is not the absolute value of technology or progression which seems to be bad - Athens, Rome, England, and America all have had great golden ages, and vastly different levels of technology. So, it is not the brain or technology that is bad. The brain, indeed, is the crown jewel of humanity. Rather, it is the idolization of the brain that can destroy a civilization. Even though the brain is our best attribute, it still has its limits - and the other parts of the body, if left unattended, will not be able to support the its extreme demands.
Does anyone really think AI will be able to sustain itself without human energy driving it? We are laughably far from that reality. Every year, Elon says cars will be self-driving - and one of these years they may be - but if it takes this long and costs this much to self-drive a car, how long will it take to do anything more physical? Most jobs are more physical than driving. The "Singularity" is a hoax. If we keep going on this path, it's much likelier we will have war with another nation before we have most of the technological achievements Utopians yearn for.
Truly, there are many places where Life flourishes but ideas are not present - but the only places ideas are present are places where Life flourishes. We must never get the order confused.
~
For the West, there is good and bad news. The good news is that, even though the Roman Republic fell - the Empire lasted about another 400 years. The fall of the Republic did not destroy the society - but it did mark the beginning of its long decline.
The bad news, though, is that we are deep into a cycle that started partially in 1945 and accelerated drastically in 1991. It is a story of how humans so often accomplish great things, and then abandon the values that brought them there. We now see an increase in Tyranny, and a decline in Morality. They are certainly linked.
But it doesn't have to be this way.
The West has done more for ourselves and the world than any other civilization ever has. We have created the greatest order and prosperity the world has every known - that is the Light of the West. Through Christianity, Farming & Industry, Law and Property Rights - we have created the greatest civilization the world has ever known.
We don't have to lose it. 1991 doesn't have to be our peak. We are not at any "End of History" - unless we decide to be. We can decide to send each man in nature, according to his ability. We can decide to respect the teachings of Christ. We can decide to expand and improve upon the long legal history we have been building since the Magna Carta. Or, we can not.
If we do not, then democracy in the West will end. Men like Trump and Elon have seen the signs - the West has strayed very far from Life. Elon lauds Napoleon for his contributions; Mark Zuckerberg looks up to Augustus so much that he copies his haircut.
Perhaps, it is not the worst thing. Perhaps, once things go too far, a man who loves his country must make war on it. And, in this war, refocus the citizens on what is essential.
Perhaps this is better than the alternative, of being conquered by a foreign power.
But war is not necessary. We, the people, can choose. The men and women of the West can choose to go back to Life. To freedom. To God.
Land is cheap in America - the question is whether we will build on it ourselves, or wait for someone else to. I choose to build. I hope you will choose the same.
If not, someone may choose for you.

18
Articles/The Problem with the Propositional Nation.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
Auron says: will people fight for it?
What we really need is nations within nations?
One problem, indeed, is that we are in a transition phase where our own natives are stateless because the state has grown larger than the biological mass that supports it.
This is related to the idea that a nation should only pursue front-door border expansion. Backdoor deals to extract resources create a selfish elite who will betray their countrymen if they begin to falter.
If we were to have a real international coalition, it would make sense for it to be a brotherhood who agree on basic things and compete with one another. Instead, we have a mass movement to live as comfortably as possible while our elites compete to extract Life from the body of a dying empire.
The propositional nation is an attempt to capitalize on demographics, while also removing rivalry with native conservatives.
But it's true that there are some good things about a possible propositional nation:
It makes war less likely, because it allows for many peoples and cultures to coexist without violence.
Perhaps what we need is to allow for more inter-identity competition within the nation, essentially creating nations within nations.

22
Articles/The decline of xenophobia charts the decline of Western connection to the land.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
Who is most connected to the land?
Him who utterly relies on it.
Hitler loved blood and soil; he vaunted the farmers.
If you are not connected to the land, you will not fight for it.
If you can live everywhere, why would you fight for anywhere?
We are becoming like the Jews; a people without a place.
Rome conquered Israel.
Cosmopolitan culture; Vienna city culture; that which Hitler hated.
Rome was cosmopolitan and Israel was not. That became false when Israel was conquered and dispersed.
Now, they are back on the land.
And becoming less cosmopolitan as a result?

129
Articles/Thoughts from the Robert. E. Lee suite - H1-Bs, Panda Express, and the Game of Life.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
*You want hard work? Repeal the Civil Rights Act.*
_American men are trapped in the box of Individualism. If we are to achieve our potential, it must be for causes greater than ourselves_.
I first got into politics a year ago
And the first time I ever had a disagreement on X is when I said the border should be closed and these men should be deported immediately.
And a liberal woman said to me:
"What, are you afraid of a little competition?"
I considered it for a little bit, because it didn't sound right - but I wasn't sure why.
And then it hit me: closing the border, rejecting people from our lands *is* the competition. That *is* the outcome that matters.
And so, when we discuss H1-Bs and Panda Express, there remains a great confusion and contradiction:
Less nationalist and xenophobic people are recommending harder work in big corporations,
And more nationalist and xenophobic people are asking for an easier economy.
But there's a fundamental problem.
Why are the *individualists* talking about hard work?
Let’s think about this for a second. When we talk about hard work, we’re talking about substance and motivation. 
I think all of us who voted for Trump know what the opposite of substance and motivation looks like: that would be Communism.
Communism is against nature, it’s against hierarchy, it’s against competition. It’s a disaster for hard work, and it destroys all motivation in the country.
But we all know this.
The question is - why we equate hard work with *individualism*?
What most don’t recognize, is that Individualism is almost as bad as Communism.
If you subscribe to the mainstream postwar beliefs, meaning you are an individualist —
You believe that economics is everything. More specifically, you believe that life consists of individuals who work hard or don’t, and who ideally need to be rewarded or not for this work.
But there’s a big problem: humans aren’t individuals. 
Even if you look at the most primitive, least developed humans, _we still live in groups._ We only live in groups. And, every time, we rely on these groups we call ‘nations’ for our life.
This isn’t just a human trait: ants, wolves, chimpanzees are exactly the same way. 
They form nations. They designate borders. They fight wars for territory. This is the way of the social animal, a category which includes humans. More than just the way of the social animal: this is the _fundamental story of the social animal._
And so, to push the idea of individualism, that economic comfort is all of life? It is a fundamental misunderstanding of the foundations of humanity and society. The nation and community come first, and _within those structures_ we decide what sort of life to live. 
The foundation of Life is NOT economic comfort. And mistaking that it is is how we get Panda Express. Individualists recommend Panda Express because all they see is the high salary. But if I work at Panda Express, what am I a part of? Some multinational liberal corporation whose entire mission is globalist comfort and enjoyment? That’s actually not competitive, or exciting, or manly.
Of course, it is manly to do what you must to start a family. But why must we be a part of nation-destroying collectives in order to do this? There is no reason.
And this is ESPECIALLY true now.
If you believe young American men should work harder, and do more, I would actually agree. But is globalist food service the noble charge of our countrymen?
Our nation is being invaded. I’m in Pennsylvania right now, dead winter, and even up here — when I go in the shop, what do I hear?
Arabic, Hindi, Spanish. English speakers are a minority.
This is a disaster. So what am I gonna do? Am I gonna go work at Panda Express?
No. And it’s not cause I’m scared to work: it’s cause I’m called to something greater.
The nation is being invaded. We can’t sit around and wrap a burrito.
Our nation is falling apart. We are being surrounded by people who don’t even speak our language. Who we can’t even coordinate with. Who aren’t a part of our culture.
How can we turn away from this fact? How can we ignore the fundamental fabric of our country fraying to pieces, and serve noodles as an individual?
We can’t.
The first step, the first priority of any nation, whether this nation is hardworking or lazy, whether this nation is capitalist or socialist, is to secure and acquire the land around us.
How did we get this land in the first place? Through collective competition, of course. The FIRST STEP of the individualistic American frontiersmen was to form collectives, and push the Indians out. THEN, and only then, are there conversations about government structure, what sort of jobs we should work, the lifestyle we want to live.
Now, like then, we are barely in peacetime. We are losing our land. And I’ll be damned if we waste our young men by sending them into food service.
We have been dispossessed, systematically, of the ownership of our land.
That’s what Biden’s open border was - a coup against the American people.
Who is the government to tell me that I can’t designate my land for Christians?
Who is the government to tell me that I can’t designate my land for British? Or for Germans?
If we can’t own and administrate territory based on any important characteristics, we are fundamentally and spiritually separated from Life itself. 
And men wonder why the young are unmotivated - because what do we have to fight for? What do we have to take risks for? What do we have to die for, if nothing beyond our lifetime actually matters?
If we cannot take land based on our shared history, ancestry, religion, or culture, we are imprisoned in this space and time. We are locked into this moment, unable to delight in the past or carry it forward to the future. And until this is remedied, NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.
We must repeal the Civil Rights Act. We must be allowed to play the game of Life AS A COMMUNITY.
Land is the greatest competition of all, and we’re losing it. How do we get more? Not by individualism. We have to focus on winning.
AND, in order to win, what do we have to do?
We have to work hard.
And we have to focus on territory. Not just nationally, but locally too. 
In other words: we need to work hard in our communities.
And that’s the important lesson here: individualism and hard work are not the same thing. Individualism, in a time like this, is terrible and destructive and buries our heads in the sand. We have to be a part of a group. We have to win as a group. And, therefore, we have to work hard. 
And this is really the answer to all the confusion. Men must be a part of something greater than ourselves.
No man will fight and die for Panda Express - but he just might for Gainesboro, or Texas, or the United States of America. 
The fundamental game of Life is who owns the land - which genes are winning, which culture is winning, which groups are gaining territory. This is the game of ants, chimps, and wolves. The story of humanity, is the story of nations and their land.
We want to play the game of Life. We want to make our mark on history, we want to look in the mirror and know that we are a part of a great nation. If we do, we will work hard. We will risk it all. 
So if you want American men to act greater, then you are in good company. I totally agree. Many men are currently lazy, underperforming, and fearful of risk.
But how do we beat it?
We repeal the Civil Rights Act.
We ditch Panda Express; we abandon globalist companies.
We rejoin the game of my grandfathers, their fathers, and their fathers before them.
The game of land, the game of nation, the game of hard work.
We play the Game of Life.

11
Articles/Tweets/On Racism.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
"Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control."
The desire for Humans to be able to control everything is that of Communists. Complaining about "physical factors beyond control"? Of course physical factors are beyond control! And, of course, we are dependent on them. If we could control all of nature, Communism would be right! But we cannot, so it is not. Just as we cannot control all of nature, so too we cannot control all of human nature, for they are one and the same. This quote makes the argument weak and incoherent.
Racists today do not, in fact, argue that all content is inherited - rather, their arguments are based on the apparatus. The implication, of course, is that those with different apparatuses and abilities will form different cultures over time. This is true and natural, and it is a result of genetic differences and different human interactions with different geographies.
To pretend as if everyone is the same, or as if everyone can simply choose who they want to be, is not grounded in reality. We cannot choose much of who we are. Some, yes, but only some. It is reasonable to say about half of our life experience is not due to choice, but due to birth. One's career, nation and culture are the easy examples of drastically different lives due to birth. This is the way of nature, and of reality. The answer is not to pretend that everyone is the same, or that everyone can choose to be whoever they want, but that every man and woman should use their own abilities as best they can.
We are all one body - with different characteristics, different abilities, and different destinies. One of the most important choices in life is to accept that. The founding fathers themselves believed that there was a "natural aristocracy" - those who are born with superior abilities. Their qualm was with the idea of trying to encode this aristocracy into a single organization, for they feared that it would be inefficient. ([https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch15s61.html…](https://t.co/iwh965xTds))
If you read that article, Jefferson mentions that the natural aristocracy is made up of two traits - virtue (chosen) and talent (not chosen). Jefferson, as do I, treats biology as half of a person's life makeup. Of course, we must avoid blaming all problems in society on a single race, which hopefully we can all agree is a reductive and foolish simplification. But it does not mean that all races are equal, or the same, or that differences should be swept under the rug. America can end its toxic relationship with race and biology when we give it its proper place - not everything, not nothing. Simply - something.

39
Articles/Tyler.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
"Bringing new people grows the pie"
But it shrinks our influence in the competition of nations.
"India can't beat us"
But at the rate they are increasing, they could in a couple generations.
"Your best bet is to get on the grind and make money"
But my goal is longer than money.
"For the country to reach its highest potential, we need to treat and reward people as individuals"
But the country produced most when we were at war.
"The WASP establishment is still in place"
No it isn't, and it is still shrinking now.
"Most people don't contribute that much, so the collective isn't as important as a few key individuals"
But everyone can be used, even as a janitor. Nations are bodies as well as brains.
Competition is supposed to happen as collective.
"We all came from Africa anyway"
But maybe we've evolved.
Never asked:
Isn't shaping people a greater goal than shaping a system?
Or: aren't people the greatest system of all?

25
Articles/War and Vice.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
“It’s not what we fear that will defeat us, but what we love”
- RFK
- Mr. Shelton
- Aldous Huxley
- Adolf Hitler
This is the view that coincides with the idea that it is the Jews at the root of all problems.
Like women, the Jews seduce. They do not fight.
But I say all these men were wrong.
It is what we fear that kills us, and the unsustainable lives are merely a result of that feat.
The Jews and our addictions are tempting to address because they are easier
They are inward problems. Problems of choice and moral fiber.
But the hard problems are the outward. They are the savage southern nations that we have given up fighting against.
I say it is these nations that kill us. The Jews are a seductress, but they are not the root.
We choose the Jews, both in indulgence and war, because we do not wish to face outward. We do not wish to face our real fears.

32
Articles/What I Stand For.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
Men these days are reluctant to say such things.
To stand for something is to be subject to irony; mockery; laughter.
These days, it is strange to have serious values. Many men think it strange even to be serious at all.
Values and seriousness are, of course, linked.
Our race, cocooned in the shell of nuclear weapons and postwar priests, is dying. We are wasting away, rotting in cities and giving way at the faintest push of opposition.
I am a Royalist
I stand for Monarchy; but not simply Monarchy.
A dictator is not sufficient; a sophist leads men astray.
Only through struggle should power to be gained.
And this struggle must come, again and again.
War is Life, war is human.
One great terror cannot change our nature.

675
Articles/Why is the West Shrinking?.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,675 @@
7.9.2024
This is the question I asked myself in January, as I watched the American border disappear.
I watched illegal immigrants pouring over, forming giant crowds in El Paso and Eagle Pass. I watched Joe Biden send federal agents to Texas, trying to force them to stand down.
It was shocking. At the time, I was deep into my own project and company. But, suddenly, my work could not distract me.
To be sure, Biden’s presidency had never seemed successful. But something about watching undesired people enter the country felt different. 
It felt visceral to watch unwelcome foreigners step onto the land, fly into the cities, and get millions in taxpayer money. 
As we saw the news, most Americans agreed: we didn’t want open borders and massive immigration. Even men who were historically liberal, such as Stephen A. Smith or Elon Musk, spoke out against what Biden was doing. 
But - despite the unpopularity - nothing changed. The opinions and desires of Americans rang out unanswered.
And so I wondered - why?
Why are Americans forced to accept giant invasions, and even to fund them?
The more I considered this, the more concerned I became. Forcing foreigners into a country is something that a government does to its enemies, not to its own citizens.
Allowing this many immigrants, 10 or 20 million, would undeniably change the nation. And if these immigrants are allowed to vote? It could change the elections directly. Since Mexicans mostly vote Democrat, there is clear incentive for the Democrats to bribe them with free money and hotel rooms. 
If Biden is bribing foreigners to change our elections, he is committing a coup against the American people. Now, whoever imports and bribes the most foreigners can hold power - not the people.
Perhaps this is why it is so visceral to watch an invasion. It is the land that we citizens rule - the basis of the American nation - that is shrinking. We are literally losing ground. And what man enjoys losing  his land? 
Indeed, the human desire to rule land is as old as nations themselves. For thousands of years, humans have formed nations and attempted to gain more land. Even animals are nationalistic: clans of Chimpanzees fight wars over _their_ own borders. To own and struggle for territory is to be a part of nature.
If one considers how we measure great nations - the geography of the Roman Empire, for instance - control over the land is the age-old measure of achievement.  In this measure, the American people are declining. We are losing ground. Our borders were a representation of our nation’s influence; of the land we owned. Now, those borders are caving in. 
America was supposed to be _my_ land - _our_ land - and we were supposed to choose how to rule it. 
But - we don’t. 
So who does?
As I thought about it, I realized that this is not just America’s problem. With recent Muslim and African invasions in Europe, European land is shrinking too. Europe is playing host to millions of immigrants who do not assimilate to the culture, and have no respect for the people there. 
But why?
Listen to a couple of political debates about uncontrolled migration, and you will hear a common argument in favor: the economic argument. The economic argument usually states that, because Western birth rates are declining, we need migrants to improve our quality of life.
Birth rates are typically glossed over, but this news is quite alarming. It’s not just our land that is shrinking. Our _people_ are shrinking. The birth rates are below two in America and most of Europe. This has not been the case for more than 1000 years.
Both our land and our people are shrinking. Yet when is the last time a Western political candidate campaigned to rule more land? Or to create more people? On these topics, all I can hear is silence. All I hear in the Western sphere is a third word - _culture._
But what is this culture, really? 
Clearly, our nations are shrinking on all fundamental counts: land, people, and culture.
This is true for almost all nations of European descent.
So, I was curious: I looked at the numbers. 
In 1960, 35 percent of the Earth was white. 90 percent of America was white. 99 percent of Britain was white. 
Now, in 2024, European peoples have shrunk from about a third of the Earth to 9 percent. Westerners have shrunk from 9/10 of America to barely half. The British have shrunk by one fifth in their own land.
These are apocalyptic numbers. Yet, not a shot was fired. Nobody is talking about it. Only in the past ten years have populist movements cropped up, speaking about vague notions of “preserving culture” and promoting the idea that, recently, things went wrong.
But Westerners’ share of the land has been steadily declining for 60 years.
So:
Why does the West shrink?
**Land, People, and Culture**
What _is_ a nation? What do I actually care about? I’ve never been really involved in politics, so I simply don’t know the answer. 
What is a nation? From the legal perspective, it is a set of lines drawn around a piece of land. Typically, these lines are drawn by a group of people - to distinguish the holdings of this group from another. 
Therefore, it seems that a nation is the collective ownership of a certain piece of land. Traditionally, citizens have been willing to fight for the sake of that ownership.
This makes sense, but the question becomes - as Americans, why are _we_ not fighting for our collective ownership? And why are we losing it?
To fight for this ownership implies cooperation, and cooperation implies internal communication and understanding. Secondly, it implies shared trust and interests. Thirdly, it implies a willingness to use force in the first place.
So, in America - if we are not cooperating to protect our collective ownership - which one of these things are we missing?
Firstly, our language and heritage is British. It is true that I rarely meet anybody who does not speak English. However, our culture today seems very abstract from the original foundations. There is much cultural conflict. Perhaps this is one source of our faltering.
Secondly, our trust and interests also may be fractured - if we disagree on our desired culture, perhaps we have different goals. So, it seems we are missing this too.
Thirdly, in order to enforce our border, we must have willingness to use force at all - and this is probably down too. Living in the middle class, most Americans I know are more interested in peace than war. Broadly speaking, our culture is very consumeristic and “zero-tolerance” for violence.
However, what about the culture? This seems to be more at the root of the American situation. As our borders fall apart - so does our culture. Even as a young man, I have watched radical changes in the culture over the past 15 years.
So - it seems that _culture_ is fundamental to a nation. And maybe, if we can understand why American culture is changing - we can understand why the political system is becoming unstable. 
So, to reiterate: _Why_ do the lines of a nation get drawn? And _how?_ And _why,_ as a traditional American_,_ are my lines _shrinking?_
The answer to all of these is the _people_ that occupy the land, of course. The people have leaders, and those leaders draw lines and combat other leaders’ lines. But the leader is completely supported by the people, and the people by the leader: they are symbiotic. They are a nation. And, together - they claim this land. 
If the borders of the land and the people of the land are shrinking, there is only one perspective available - we are in decline. 
When I saw we, what do I mean? I mean the European inheritors of this land. America, Europe, and the greater Western legacy. 
To be a part of a nation, which I thought I was, is to have a birthright to a plot of land. To allow millions of foreigners into this land is to give that birthright away. America and the West are now locked in a battle between parties who want to keep the land in the hands of the citizens, and those who want to give it away. 
Therefore, Americans are now locked in a battle against leaders who support the Americans’ claim to the land, and leaders who don’t.
Britain is this way, as well. Much of Europe is. 
We are fighting a battle to determine - are our governments legitimate? Is our power legitimate? This is the question of the modern West. 
Our economists want to tell us - “the economy is not a zero sum game! Think of innovation! A rising tide lifts all boats!”
This is partially true. A rising tide _does_ lift all boats. But it doesn’t lift all boats equally - and what is the difference? Who owns the land, of course! This will tell you who reaps the most profits. 
I don’t hate Mexicans, but I don’t like them as much as Americans either. To me, it is obvious - I like people like me. White, yes - but British too. And Scottish especially. 
I like to see familiar faces. I like people who share my values, my culture, and my religion. I like people who feel as if I have met them before.
This all sounds racist. That’s because it is. I am racist. I have preferences. I would rather live around Scots than Slavs, for instance. 
I’m also sexist - but we can get to that later. 
It should be said - since racism is usually backwater business - I am not a redneck. I am upper-middle class - close enough to the middle to be a part of broad American culture, but close enough to the elite to understand them. 
I am also not an intentional rebel. Rebellious as some of these ideas are, they are merely my observations from my own life - a life which many Americans can surely relate to. 
Funnily enough, I have known several men who have - in the quiet of the night or in a drunken moment of honesty - “confess” to me that they feel the same. That they feel they are racist. And they feel quite guilty. 
Based on my experiences, and the people I have connected with (of all races), I believe it is very obvious - to be racist is to be human. To feel and agree with a familial bond is to be human. Without such a feeling, we are barely better than robots. Colorblind and cultureless, stumbling through life with no sense of history or people or place. 
Indeed, one can think of human love as a set of concentric circles - self, family, extended family, tribe, nation, civilization, race, and species. You can draw any size of circle you want - 1,000, 10,000, 100,000 - at any size, there are that number of people out there who are most closely related to you. If you met them, you’d probably feel it.
Each circle has its own value and importance.
But what is the _amount_ of importance for each? How important is family vs. race vs. tribe? 
Ask yourself. It is important. Don’t deceive yourself - the question is, where you are down or making a difficult decision or generally just viewing the world - which circle comes first? Which circle is the filter for your choices?
I’ll ask another question - when is the last time we had a Western leader who put their main faith in the middle four circles? (tribe, nation, race, civilization).
It seems we have had many leaders who loved America - but have we? 
If they are importing other people, and gaining no land for us, can it really be said that they love us? If they will not fight for us one bit - is that love? Or are they _really_ loyal to principles far grander than the people within the country?
I would like to share some demographics.
In 1960, 35 percent of the world was white.
In 1960, 90 percent of America was European.
In 1960, 99.9% of Britain was British.
You know what the figures are today? 
9% of the world is white. Down 26%.
54% of America is European. Down 36%.
80% of Britain is British. Down 20%. 
Is that anything but cataclysmic? 
What leaders fight for us? 
When Nigel Farage gets on stage, watch what they ask him. Watch how they try and pinpoint him into saying something “wrong” - into saying that he prefers British people to Arabs. This sort of rhetoric has been done to every Western leader in the past 60 years.
What are they doing?
They are proving his fealty to the big circle - species - and ensuring he has no fealty, _or even thoughts,_ about the middle four.  It is a completely Orwellian concept - tiptoeing around obvious opinions so as to pledge fealty to some mysterious force up above.  
The television pundits must _ensure_ that the middle parts of Nigel Farage or Donald Trump or Pat Buchanan’s human consciousness are hollowed out - such that not even a thought of tribe, nation, or race exists. And if they do think of nation - it’s multicultural, of course! There is no _biological_ identity of a Brit or an American - of course not!
And if one thought is present? Front-page news, massive media blitz. “Scandal”. “Outrage”. And, for 60 years, the Western people have been led into buying it. 
Well - I am racist. I am human, and therefore I am racist. I like people who are like me more than people who aren’t, and I would love for my descendants to number the earth like the sands of the desert.
Normal, right? But somehow, considered an abomination. Mysterious. 
Take note of what I’ve said -  _I would love for my descendants to number the earth like the sands of the desert._ Abrahamic, and obviously not controversial to anyone who knows the Bible. And - most importantly - racist. 
If I want my descendants to be like me, and to number the earth, then I am clearly a racist. Because I like those who share my genes and I want them to beat out those how do not. 
Racism is _directly tied_ to a man’s desire to reproduce.
I am the master race? I will have many children!
Racism is evil? I will not have many children, because there i_s no long-term point._ 
If I am not racist, I am not _building_ anything by having children. I am merely engaging in a vaguely enjoyable and noble activity. Two kids, suburban house. Why not? 
But, better yet, why have kids at all?
Clearly my race is not very good, since I am not allowed to promote it. Therefore, as a man, there is no broad mission in having children. Why not just relax? Live in an apartment? Own nothing? There’s nobody to pass things down to, after all. No legacy; no tradition, no culture. All that matters now is money and pleasure.
The Western situation is clear. We do not consider our tribes, nations, or races to be great. Therefore, we are not building anything great by having children. Therefore, except for a vague idea that “people do it”, there is no great reason for men and women to have children. 
Therefore, after 60 years of this sort of thinking, our borders are evaporating and our share of the world is disappearing. Our  nations are hollow shells, driving themselves into a distant and hostile future while we watch them, ever smaller, moving down the road. 
If you can’t destroy a nation from the outside, do it from within - make it so that the nation doesn’t _mean_ anything. There is no real culture or religion or race or custom - and therefore, other groups can come in and hollow it out.
If they can do it enough - the nukes are someone else’s! No bloodshed required. 
**Globalism & Barbarism**
It seems clear that there are two forces which act as pincers to cause the West to shrink. 
The first is, obviously, the people who are actually entering Western land. These people are always from poorer and less civilized countries, and they often bring these values to their host nations. 
Then, there are the elites - the politicians, media, and higher-up forces which aggressively push for these people to be able to enter. These people are what could be called “globalist” - they have a rosy view of technology and collaboration, and believe national competition is outdated. 
So, essentially, we are living between the encroaching forces of Globalism and Barbarism.
The forces of barbarism are perfectly understandable: poorer people see an economic opportunity, and they take it. Imperialistic men, such as radical Islamists, see an opportunity to seize more land. These are the natural, national forces of all human history. They do not require much explanation. 
The forces of globalism, though, are more perplexing. Why do these people want mass immigration? Why do they believe what they do about nations and borders? Who even are they?
Globalists are the often utopian people in our societies who don’t mind that the West is shrinking. They believe that this idea of “dominion over the land” is outdated. In fact, many would prefer that Western citizens forget about owning the land altogether.
Clearly, there are many people with this view in our government. Therefore, if we want to understand why the West is shrinking, it would be good to understand the mindset of people who don’t care about governance over land at all.
These are two worldviews that most often seem to hold this belief:
**Technological Communism**
- Because of AI and technology, we are approaching an era of complete abundance. This means that everything will be automated, nobody will have any reason to seriously compete with each other, and therefore we will be happy to live as individuals in a prosperous society rather than a collective vying for resources. 
- This belief is commonly held by Silicon Valley thinkers and workers. Naturally, these people have a very strong belief in technology. Silicon Valley, and the tech world in general, is also typically averse to physical conflict. This is probably because thinkers are often sensitive people. These people often live physically comfortable lives in the city, and believe that everyone will eventually live this way when tech automates more jobs.
**Neoliberal Globalization**
- Because of globalization, we are approaching an era of extreme abundance. This means that nobody will have any reason to seriously compete with each other, and therefore we will be happy to live as individuals in a prosperous society rather than a collective vying for resources. 
- This is similar to the technological communism belief, except that it has slightly less faith in technology. People with these beliefs are not necessarily counting on a post-abundance society, but are simply counting on technology to continue to advance and provide opportunities for global cooperation. With these increased opportunities, the thinking goes, there will be no reason to seriously compete as nations because we all have different geographic resources and can all benefit more by building a global supply chain. 
So - consider these two belief systems: Techno-Communism and Neoliberal Capitalism. 
We were taught in modern America that Capitalism and Communism are complete opposites - so why do they seem so _similar?_ 
Why does America now have so many prominent capitalist leaders who believe in a centrally-controlled, technological distribution of resources? Why do they believe in a global utopia that will erase our problems? That’s supposed to be communism, right? 
Indeed, mainstream Western economies are filled with globalist and utopian ideologies - universal creeds which do not believe in the importance of a strong connection to land. The reasons they give are that it is unnecessary for human societies to compete for resources.
But - hold on - isn’t competition the _point_ of capitalism? 
It seems as if our societies tolerate monetary competition, but not geographic competition. Why?
Geographic competition - competition for land - is the way of much of the mammal world. Historically, this includes humans. Geographic competition, in both humans and animals, is the main source of war. 
But today, and for the past 60 years, Western nations have been striving to eliminate geographic competition. We have been striving to keep global borders the same, and to eliminate any conflagrations or significant changes that might occur.
This way of thinking is typically called the “Postwar consensus,” in reference to World War II. Since that time, no Western nation has seriously attempted to expand its borders in a meaningful way.
If our leaders shun geographic competition at any costs, there are essentially two possible answers as to why:
1.
They are correct. We have to discovered human truths that have never been discovered in the past. The truth is that competition over land is fruitless, and it is much better to focus on technology and cooperation.
2.
World War II scarred the Western nations such that we became inward-facing and averse to conflict. Therefore, the popular ideology is to shun geographic expansion, and instead seek economic partnership with everyone in the world. 
Most Westerners, I believe, still agree with #1. 
But, as I watched the border collapsed, it made me angry. And upon seeing the way that Western demographics are shrinking, it made me very concerned.  
If we shy away from competition for land - are we forming a monopoly against nature?
Are our leaders giving people so much pleasure that they forget about competition? 
So - to answer if Westerners should care about migration, we must answer - what is the human relationship to land? Is owning land important? Are borders important? 
Many of the political opinions about migration seem to fall into two categories - people who want to own and govern plots of land, and people who are okay living with little ownership.  
Since 1960, there has been much hodgepodge about “meritocracy”, “colorblindness”, and “equality” - but what is the outcome? Only European countries shrink!
So - they are not fighting for you, or your parents, or your grandparents. They are fighting for “bigger principles” - and therefore giving Western land to others.
Because, of course, the distinction only goes one way.
European lands open up to foreigners, but foreign lands are not any bit more inviting to Europeans. No countries subsidize us in our visits - no countries grant us citizenship, housing, or welfare. 
Indeed - we give away our land to them, and they do not give theirs to us. 
Why? 
What is the point?
If we have a genius among us, would we not encourage him to have more children? Nurture his blood in our society? 
Do we need genius from other places? Are we incapable of having children and expanding? 
Of course not!
But the establishment assumes so.
And thus, we shrink. 
In the immigration debates, we always find the topic of “demographics” - the idea that if Western nations don’t take in immigrants, we will lose economic standing because we will not have enough workers to maintain our GDP. 
They say that the reason we will not have enough workers is because our birth rates are low.
Why are the birth rates low? well, clearly - our masses aren’t producing children.
Why aren’t the masses producing children - what are they most down about? Losing their jobs, of course.
So why are we at odds with ourselves? The workers complain of the economy, the elites use birth rates as an excuse - and meanwhile, the West keeps shrinking.
It is at this point that I would like to say the obvious - the narratives are all fake. A façade. The West grew for 1,000 years, conquering nearly the whole Earth as a result. 
Naturally, this raises the question - why are the birth rates low? But, for some reason, nobody wants to ask. 
That cannot be the case. Europeans built this civilization, the greatest in the world.
There is a union in the West between those who are too comfortable and those who are not comfortable enough. Ultimately, it seems, they are two sides of the same coin: brutality and nihilism. Depression and the violent attempt to feel something. 
These forces can also be known as the Utopians and the Barbarians. 
6 of the 8 leaders of the Manhattan Project were Jewish. [https://jewishunpacked.com/the-real-story-behind-oppenheimer/](https://jewishunpacked.com/the-real-story-behind-oppenheimer/)
As in Nazi Germany, the body and mind are divided. The body and mind of Christ, Christians and the Jews, are turned against each other.
Now, the Jews are cheating on the Christians with other, more savage nations

7
Articles/Will you fight for a piece of land?.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
Races have a connection to their land which span thousands of years and dozens of generations.
The genes of the British have been shaped by Britain.
Violence is unpleasant; but isn’t it more unreasonable to not fight?

74
Articles/Woke Right.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
What exactly does woke mean?
If someone says “wow! My eyes were closed, now I’m awake!”
What does that mean?
It means that they came upon an idea that was significantly different than their previous ones.
That’s it.
All “woke” means is that a man has discovered something that deviates from common convention.
So the argument that I am “woke” is just saying I differ from convention. And the way it’s used is often to make me seem immature, or like a leftist who is trying to “reinvent morality”.
But the problem is that I am ALIGNED with the past several thousand years.
You say you’re right wing and traditional, you say I’m new and weird, but what are my opinions really?
Just what my grandfather would have said. And his grandfather before him, and so on.
You’re seeing how unsustainable this NEW consensus is, which has only existed for 60 years, and you’re saying I’m woke because I want to defer to the wisdom of the past 1500!
It makes no sense.
I differ from the convention of the past 60 years.
But YOU differ from the convention of the past 1500.
The only “woke right” here is the group of Western men who believes the total reinvention and radical changes of society since the 60s was good, actually, and should keep going. The only “Woke Right” here is the group that says they’re right wing, and yet are indistinguishable from the bleeding heart liberals that my grandfather voted AGAINST.
"Right-Wingers" - just like Reagan and Bush!
who want a global Empire;
A multicultural society;
who look at the nation as just an idea;
and technology is the ultimate good;
because the brain is above the womb.
They love the Enlightenment,
and flirt with Utopia.
They will not fight for things of old,
against race, nation, or religion,
but run from ancient war,
because their own lives matter more.
And many right wingers will say “no, that’s not me! I don’t like multiculturalism! I don’t worship technology!”
But are you racist?
Do you care about race?
Because race is God’s technology for survival. Race is shaped by nation, culture, and religion over thousands of years. To keep us alive. To allow us to live in the places we do.
And if you believe in a nation, which just ships people in and out, completely at will based on the economic numbers, you don’t care about God’s technology at all!
We already have code. It’s called DNA!
And you write on it with every experience you have. And you carry the experiences of your forefathers inside you.
And only a woke liberal would come to me and say “let’s throw that away”, because it’s not good for our finances, or because people will be mad.
You hate when people deny biology on gender, you hate when people say there are infinite genders or all genders are the same, and yet you say the exact same thing about race!
And, ironically, a man and a woman in China are more similar to EACH OTHER than the man is to a man in Africa, or the woman to a woman.
And you say “all races are the same, it’s just the environment”
Do you hear yourself?
It’s just like the feminists and the gays. Same exact rhetoric. We’re all just blank slates. And the differences between races are way BIGGER than sex!
God formed us in the womb, but I guess doesn’t care about race!
God wove us with love and care, but I guess he closed his eyes when it came to anything racial!

2
Articles/You say globalism has done great things for me - well, what has it done for my genes?.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
I am my genes as much as my feelings. The good of my genes is as important as the good of my feelings.

35
Blockcatcher/Blockcatcher.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
### Core Features
1. Track the time and precise location a walker spends per house (location log every 3-5 sec)
GPS to determine when they move
2. Record audio
Ability to recognize doorknock/discern from noise
Log timestamp of doorknock
Identify when the wait at the doors ends -> conversation starts OR gps logs motion leaving the door.
Retrieve the number of real interactions
Learn response rate vs wait time per door -> adapt per voter tipe/time of day to optimize response rate (we win votes when we talk not when we wait)
11.13
4hr
Remaking app in Capacitor
10.31
1hr
6:40pm - 7:40pm
Established connection between app (sending location) and dashboard
1hr
8:10pm - 9:10pm

11
Blockcatcher/Todo.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
- [ ] Import data with csv
Get location coordinates from each address
- [x] Change interval to 1s
- [ ] Admin map to see walker location
- [ ] Admin map to see addresses
- [ ] Record audio when start button is pressed
- [ ] Create route for walkers
- [ ] Identify how long a person stayed within a home radius
Flag if someone remained in an area for more than a flagged time, like 35s
Time will be modified based on demographic information, lot size, time of day, etc.
- [ ] App map to see addresses

19
Blockcatcher/Tools.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
1. Tijuana
https://github.com/TheCommonsLibrary/Tijuana
2. Neighbourly
https://github.com/TheCommonsLibrary/Neighbourly
3. Spoke
https://github.com/MoveOnOrg/Spoke App for texts
4. CampaignHawk
Small open source, prob not worth it
5. CiviCRM
Could be good, basically a duplicate though
Probably should look at the UI
6. Commons Library – Canvassing Tools Roundup (as a reference list)
Greg Abbot's software - Campaign Sidekick
Maps
https://openfreemap.org/

45
Blockcatcher/i360.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
I360 features 
1- Store voter data with tags per data entry 
2- Search function based on tags/voter info: 
- individual voter lookup (name address age)
- Group search with tags (combine tags, exclude tags, add new tags to current search, see in map {buggy})
- Basic map grouping feature for search (draw a shape and it selects the voters inside it on the map, limited use)
3- create survey+script with that custom search
4- automatic mapping of walkbooks (sucks though)
5- friendly user interface that doesn’t crash (quite good but non customizable)
6- export/import csv voter data (export survey results - supporters to texting software)
7- daily leaderboard page with some results per knocker to see how the day is going (not detailed enough and quite buggy)
8- oversee the surveys from the back end as they go to see general results and assign walkers to different areas
What could be improved in those features?
-Ai dictation to select and exclude tags when doing a survey - gets so complicated it takes forever to target -
- Ability to change or tailor survey per voter type (tags)
- Customize blockwalker app interface for most relevant voter info/tags/colors
- color coded map for analysis of city areas (partisan affiliation/religion etc)
**

4
Books/Gesta Regum Anglorum.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
_William of Malmesbury_
https://www.amazon.com/Gesta-Regum-Anglorum-Arthurian-Classics/dp/1699776989/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?crid=X61HD3NS19W0&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.VgkKobZoK1X0h3D1LROMioqFSjMsQ0ieFHG6FgFp4_U.X2U-2SLvOMGRxGdsKgKHVDO2KUsumGFdilqnlpjhHOM&dib_tag=se&keywords=gesta+regum+anglorun&qid=1740762732&sprefix=gesta+regum+anglorun%2Caps%2C137&sr=8-1-fkmr1
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/50778/50778-h/50778-h.htm

BIN
Books/IMG_2092.jpeg Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.7 MiB

10
Books/List.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
The Red and the Black
Troubling the Waters: Black-Jewish Relations in the American Century
https://crossculturalsolidarity.com/books-about-contemporary-far-right-extremism/
https://www.amazon.com/Homegrown-Timothy-McVeigh-Right-Wing-Extremism/dp/1668013576
https://www.amazon.com/Chaos-Comes-Calling-Far-Right-Small-Town/dp/1645030431

1
Books/Morte d'Arthur.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
https://www.amazon.com/Morte-dArthur-Knights-Leather-bound-Classics/dp/1626864632?psc=1&pd_rd_w=MIa9V&content-id=amzn1.sym.ea1d9533-fbb7-4608-bb6f-bfdceb6f6336&pf_rd_p=ea1d9533-fbb7-4608-bb6f-bfdceb6f6336&pf_rd_r=PPTEPWVMXB20PE66T9F9&pd_rd_wg=WA0kf&pd_rd_r=1fc7b507-40a9-4f00-ba97-50596365bdce&ref_=sspa_dk_detail_2&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9kZXRhaWxfdGhlbWF0aWM=#customerReviews

23
Books/Printing.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
Current public domain: 95 years after publication
Current year as of 1/2025: 1929
The War Against the West, Kolnai
Not sure about copyrights but people are printing it
https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/against-west/author/aurel-kolnai/
Passing of the Great Race, Grant
Copyright expired
The Alchemist font - closest to Kennerly
Line Height = 5/32 of an inch
Race, Evolution, Behavior: 3/32, very cramped
Fallen Leaves: 4/32, Normal
![[IMG_2092.jpeg]]

1
Books/Royal Geneologies.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Anderson

23
Children and Land.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
I need to be a part of something with soul
A community with soul
Not money, not sleekness, but soul
I have felt it.
I have felt it while sitting in the river, thinking Life is good. Sitting by the fire, too.
Maybe Boerne is the next step towards Tennessee and Alaska.
Do I need to be in San Marcos?
It is in a good location. To be fair.
Austin has no soul. Not anymore.
I have no money. If I had money, I would feel better.
But I always want the land, too.
And the soul.
Those who exist on the edges of society are either kings or slaves.
This is why black people in America have an all or nothing mindset. Nobody really wants them here.
All my happiest times were when I was in society. Growing up, and then parts of Geneva or USAA.

1
Concepts/"The West".md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
They call us “the West” because it’s west of Israel

2
Concepts/Apathy is weak, weakness is disrespectful..md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
If the people around you deserve disrespect, then so be it. But otherwise, apathy is failure.
In other words: failure to fail is failure.

53
Concepts/Coding Era.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
This thing is so futuristic it makes my eyes hurt.
Give me the simple ink on paper.
JEEZ.
The more dependencies I have, the less fun coding is.
Dude. This is so fun. Own it.
I’m here. Noah and D. This is our house. We love it here.
But we’re not building ownership of anything.
It’s all temporary.
At least we own the house in San Antonio.
And isn’t that what I always wanted?
That’s God speaking to me.
Quit the addiction to fast and sexy life.
Literally, the bane of It’s a Wonderful Life.
All these people are developing tech so fast.
But you know what? We still have time.
I’m becoming like Delaney.
Never wanna lift. Never wanna shoot.
All focused on coding. Writing.
And yet I could just work as a machinist any time. 
Maybe I wouldn’t be in this house but I’d still be in the city.
With them.
But isn’t Boerne similar to what I really want?
I need to think about my life. And talk to God.

1
Concepts/Compromise.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
So long as you don't compromise personal ethics, morals, etc, you should be fine. That's how feds work: they find compromised individuals, flip them, then get that guy to try and flip others but the fundamental way they do this is to slowly get you to agree to things you don't want to or previously didn't want to. Same thing pimps do, quite literally.

2
Concepts/Deodorant.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1957/11/23/90856988.html?pageNumber=33
600% increase between 1942 and 1957

19
Concepts/Drugs.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
Evil foreigners are slipping drugs into our nation
They made the drugs harder over time
Weed in the 60s, Heroin in the 80s, e.g.
Drugs aren’t associated with my happiest times
Every moment, am I going forward or back?
People do drugs because they need motivation
Stimulation.
If drugs make you docile, you are giving up.
Many men have been taught to give up.
Bad fathers

5
Concepts/Expanding on evolution 2.0.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
Does pain in an area stop it from growing / expanding?
Connectedness score for laws. For drunk driving / vehicle charges:
How close the car is to its surroundings
Speed, openness, area it’s in

10
Concepts/Fat and Strong.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
The fat and strong kids are republicans 
The weak and skinny ones are democrats
But we are reaching something new
Violence of the weak
Liberals mate with people that aren’t like them.

1
Concepts/I feel good when I feel loose..md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
I feel loose after I go hard.

3
Concepts/In living close to nature.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
"In living close to nature, one discovers that happiness does not consist in maximizing pleasure. It consists in tranquility. Once you have enjoyed tranquility long enough, you acquire actually an aversion to the thought of any very strong pleasure - excessive pleasure would disrupt your tranquility. One also learns that boredom is a disease of civilization. It seems to me that what boredom mostly is is that people have to keep themselves entertained or occupied, because if they aren’t, then certain anxieties, frustrations, discontents, and so forth, start coming to the surface, and it makes them uncomfortable. Boredom is almost nonexistent once you’ve become adapted to life in the woods. If you don’t have any work that needs to be done, you can sit for hours at a time just doing nothing, just listening to the birds or the wind or the silence, watching the shadows move as the sun travels, or simply looking at familiar objects. And you don’t get bored. You’re just at peace."
- Theodore John Kaczynski

6
Concepts/Lessons From America's Childhood.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
Government should not be secular
- You can be ruled by Chistians or Atheists, there is no in-between
Minority cultures should not exist
- Minorities must assimilate or be part of a different nation. Separate minority cultures mean we are not a nation at all.
Division by foreign entities is one of the greatest dangers of democracy

4
Concepts/Most People’s Definition of Fascism.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
is “any time a European nation uses its military for its own interests”
That right there is very telling.

3
Concepts/Naming Animals.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
Naming different animals will teach you about humans
Naming with human names like conrad

2
Concepts/Questions for People.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Do they want to see you venerated in history?

4
Concepts/Technology allows for replication of ideas.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
Whoever is more reliant on technology opens up their ideas to replication
But, of course, can also engage in this replication and mix and match in a powerful way

8
Concepts/The others are waiting.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
The European whites are waiting on us.
They are all waiting on us.
Our culture is dominant. Country is everywhere. We are the last pioneers. The bravest - the vanguard, the heir to the North. 
DO SOMETHING!

26
Concepts/Ways of Speaking.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
Why does Dad’s speaking bother me?
Stutter, trailing off
Beating around the bush
Lack of passion
Too much finality (speaking with expectation of response)
Too many words without feeling
Laughing like it’s unnatural
Symptoms:
Too much routine
Too little stimulation
Too much dependence on others

0
Concepts/What sort of person questions Life?.md Normal file
View File

2
Concepts/Women Love This.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
“I had the most perfect girl in the world, but I lost her”
Women love this more than anything

25
Definitions/A Woman.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
is meant to represent your love;
To receive it.
An anxious man can never be a great lover.
No woman wants to be with a guy who moves less than her.
Who has less energy.
The woman is meant to be sitting at home while the man takes action.
This is what she is built for.
Your love is supposed to be constant;
you are supposed to know where it comes from.
It is supposed to come from the people around you.
And from conquering death.
“
I believe that love that is true and real, creates a respite from death. All cowardice comes from not loving or not loving well, which is the same thing.
And then the man who is brave and true looks death squarely in the face, like some rhino-hunters I know or Belmonte, who is truly brave — it is because they make love with sufficient passion, to push death out of their minds. Until it returns, as it does, to all men.
And then you must make really good love again.
“
-- “Ernest Hemingway” (Woody Allen)

2
Definitions/Collectivism.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
- The doctrine that the interests of the collective are or ought to be ethically paramount
- The opposite of [[Individualism]]

1
Definitions/Individualism.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
 A doctrine that the interests of the individual are or ought to be ethically paramount.(Merriam-Webster, 12.28.2024).

1
Definitions/Life.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Life is the greatest Order. An organism is a giant collaboration: billions of cells, working to achieve a common goal of growth and reproduction.

1
Definitions/Quality.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Quality is Connection to Reality.

7
Definitions/Seriousness.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
Seriousness is the attitude which handles problems.
The more serious, the more Death lies in the problem.
All humans have this attitude, but it is more prevalent in the North.
The North takes more work to survive.

31
Dreams.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
9.30
I dreamed that I was invited to hang out with a group.
They were cool. Mary Louise and a thin southern girl were there. Many guys too. Everyone was energetic; everything was fun.
Then, they invited me to live in their house.
It was a hostel sort of place.
They said I should come over and see it, so I followed them there.
I walked upstairs, and there was a group sitting on the couches. They were messing around. The southern girl was especially playful; she jumped on a guy’s lap.
As I stood there, the energy faded. I asked where the rest of the people were and was told they were in their rooms. For some reason, I had thought they were always together. It was strange to hear that they were separated. It was also strange to hear that they weren't doing much of anything. This was much different from when I met them.
I began to get a sinking feeling; a feeling of distrust. The mood was dead, nothing like it was before.
I was reminded of the Brown dorms at Rice.
Not in a good way.
The room was dark and messy. The walls were red. Couches were black. There was a neon Bluetooth speaker that everyone was playing music through. I began feeling there was something deeply immature about these people. They were obsessed with color and pleasure. They were dependent on the corporate technology around them.
They got up to go somewhere, and they were expecting me to come with them.
There was a tranny in a goth outfit, talking about transitioning. The more I looked, the more the room looked hellish. Black, red, and gothic skulls. I wondered if I and everyone around me was really a devil. I wondered if we were really in Hell.
I woke up,
Kleynhes
WernerHuman18

4
Elon Represents Weaponization of Civilization.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
This has not been done in 80 years.
His idea of “greater heights” requires growth; growth means expansion.

4
Friends.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
Bungoman
President Dallas
Sean ashbach?

BIN
Group 1.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 15 KiB

BIN
Group 2.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 21 KiB

64
Hearthfire Security.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
**Why**
Over time, America has become increasingly chaotic. President Trump is trying to reverse this, but it is unclear whether this will be successful in the long term.
Riots, unrest, and general crime are all risks we face. This is especially true in the next three years, as political tensions mount and the 2028 election approaches.
Given that this is true, the private security sector stands to play an important role. In fact, it already has been. From 2014 to 2022, the security contracting industry grew from $22 to $33 billion, a 50% increase. (https://www.belfrysoftware.com/blog/security-guard-industry-statistics)
At the same time, the number of Americans who want to get involved is also increasing. This is a great and large network of young men which is mostly untapped at the moment.
As things change in America, our situation becomes more and more similar to that of South Africa, which is also a fractured society.
In South Africa, there are more men in private security than in the police and military combined. (https://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/08/business/south-africa-private-security).
**Who**
I am Sam Russell, I have started two other companies called Hyperia and Captured Sun. I recently got a security job at Tesla to get some experience, and I have a level 3 (armed guard) license.
**Methods of Gaining Business**
Churches and Schools
Political organizations (Young Republicans, TPUSA, etc.)
SAM government contracts (we have priority)
Social media
Hyperia
On demand
**Plan**
We have an expansive network of potential guards in other states. Since there are several states which have few or no regulations, we can begin operating in several states with low cost.
We can apply for SAM contracts and then recruit men for jobs as needed.
**Ask**
$20,000
We need money to fund the training, uniforms, and insurance costs. The insurance costs are by far the largest expense, since many states (including Texas) require at list $1 million of coverage. The good news is that insurance is transferable between states, so this makes scaling the company relatively cheap.
**Company License:**
Application: $500
**Cost of Onboarding One Guard**
Uniform: $250
L2: 30, 65 $110
L3: 200, 57 $275
L4: 250, 60 $325
Total: ~$1000
**Insurance**:
$10,000 per year
$833 per month
(Can this be paid by month?)
**Other State Licenses**
Assuming $500 each: $1500

72
Hyperia Notes.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
My phone:
Search (browser)
Music
Hyperia:
Forum (grid feed | friends, locale, nation)
Guardians (rides + security)
Search (Browser)
Documents (Google Drive)
Messages
Jobs
Market
Documents
Mail
Projects
Notes
Photos
Politics
Messages
Social Media / Grid Feed
Twitter:
Feed
Search
Grok
Notifications
Messages
Payments
- [x] The merchant’s DBA name;
- [x] Contact info including a physical address, phone number, and email address for customer support;
- [x] Pricing for the products and services;
- [x] A return and refund policy;
- [x] ~~A shipping policy if applicable;~~
- [x] A privacy policy;
- [x] Bank card symbols listed on the website;
- [x] A functional payment portal.
Biggest quill annoyances:
I keep forgetting to do "register()" at the bottom
navigation still a lil weird
the 758 stuff for file serving
Images don't respond to x / y, width / height, border. Same with inputs
Importing shadows is annoying
11.24
12:40am - ws messages for Forum
11.23
3:40 - 4:00 fixing signin, making join actually work normally
4:00 - 4:20 creating parchment terminal
4:40 - 6:00 terminal / notes

11
Hyperia/Alaska.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
30,000 soldiers
1600 Army National Guard
1000 policemen
~263,000 voted in last governor's election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Alaska_gubernatorial_election
188,000 voted in primary - top four advance to general
12,000 for the fourth guy
76,000 for the top guy
**Military**
Elmendorf-Richardson (Anchorage) has the most soldiers
Wainwright (Fairbanks) is also significant

32
Hyperia/Business Plan.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
"A High-Trust Society"
- Family-Friendly
- No Pornography, Gambling, Drugs, et cetera
- Positive Cultural Content
- Classical History
**Infrastructure**
Search (Parchment)
Webpages (Parchment)
Apps (Parchment)
File Storage (Parchment)
**Apps**
| "Apple Name" | Form | Current Analogue | Implementation |
| ------------ | -------- | ------------------- | ------------------------ |
| Notes | .page | Notes | Parchment |
| Tasks | .task | Trello | Parchment |
| News | .news | News.. | Parchment |
| Photos | .... | Google, iPhoto | Parchment |
| Videos | .... | Youtube, iPhoto | Parchment |
| Encyclopedia | .wiki | Wikipedia | ?? |
| Market | .product | Amazon | ?? |
| Jobs | .job | LinkedIn | ?? |
| Map | | Maps | ?? |
| Messages | .msg | Messages | Forum (Matrix Messenger) |
| Mail | .email | Gmail | Forum |
| Forum | | Reddit, Twitter, TG | Forum |
| Government | | Forum | Forum |
| Call | | Zoom, FT | Forum (Jitsi Meets) |
| Directory | | Contacts | Forum |

3
Hyperia/Community Size.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
The community must be smaller than 80 million.
Perhaps 1 million?

1
Hyperia/Currency.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
https://www.wired.com/2009/06/e-gold/

6
Hyperia/Dance Halls.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
There must be fun places to go which are not degenerate.
Two-stepping can be exported across the nation
Small bars like the White Horse, with local folk music

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More